- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
@whyisiglikethis341 that’s a great mindset! good luck :) and @mobaid781-1 good luck to you! thank you for the advice
Thank you both so much for your advice! It’s really helpful and I appreciate it
Yesterday I took the real thing and it was rough. I only started studying at the end of July, so I know I need much more practice, but I am just really discouraged because I want to apply for fall 2023 and I am afraid my lsat score won’t be enough to go where I want. I could apply next year, but I don’t want to wait two whole years to attend law school. I am going to retake in November, but that’s still not much time. Not sure if this is the right path for me
My biggest mistake in interpreting this argument was assuming it was true. In my head while reading the stimulus I thought "hmm, maybe they are just smoking less cause its more expensive now", but then the conclusion stated it was actually a result of the ad campaign, so I disregarded my initial gut feeling and figured what the authors were saying was the correct reason smoking declined. Because of this erroneous thought process, AC D then seemed completely irrelevant.
I often get confused on when assumptions are okay to make. JY's explanation for why C was wrong was along the lines of "of course other minerals are present". Aren't we supposed to leave outside knowledge out of our reasoning? Doesn't C offer an alternative hypothesis that maybe the other minerals are responsible for the increase in algae and not the ferrous material? It at least seems that C is more reasonable and less far-fetched than D. D brings up stuff the stimulus never even mentioned.
#help (Added by Admin)
"dickery"