I often get confused on when assumptions are okay to make. JY's explanation for why C was wrong was along the lines of "of course other minerals are present". Aren't we supposed to leave outside knowledge out of our reasoning? Doesn't C offer an alternative hypothesis that maybe the other minerals are responsible for the increase in algae and not the ferrous material? It at least seems that C is more reasonable and less far-fetched than D. D brings up stuff the stimulus never even mentioned.
#help (Added by Admin)
Thank you both so much for your advice! It’s really helpful and I appreciate it
Yesterday I took the real thing and it was rough. I only started studying at the end of July, so I know I need much more practice, but I am just really discouraged because I want to apply for fall 2023 and I am afraid my lsat score won’t be enough to go where I want. I could apply next year, but I don’t want to wait two whole years to attend law school. I am going to retake in November, but that’s still not much time. Not sure if this is the right path for me
@ that’s a great mindset! good luck :) and @-1 good luck to you! thank you for the advice