Eva: we should incorporate a "smart highway" system to help drivers take alternate roads and avoid congestion. This system would reduce traffic congestion and an added bonus is a decrease in the loss of money and productivity that is a result of this congestion.
Luis: We don't really need this, we already have radios that provide drivers with traffic reports.
AC
A: if we implement this system, the cars won't breakdown anymore. this is providing an AC that is outlandish. just because a highway system changes doesn't mean your car's suspension system will last forever.
B: mentions traffic lights which are not mentioned anywhere in the passage or even referred to.
C: makes the assumption that the traffic congestion mentioned can be improved. if the congestion is way past the point where a change in highway systems wouldn't make a difference, Eva's argument falls apart.
D : who cares about different systems in different cities. that doesn't matter.
E: weakens the argument because it states that any old vehicle would not be able to integrate with/ benefit from this smart system.
Im currently in the high 160s looking to break into the 170s. Doing it in a group as whole seems to be the right way forward so shoot me a message if you are interested.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
stimulus
Eva: we should incorporate a "smart highway" system to help drivers take alternate roads and avoid congestion. This system would reduce traffic congestion and an added bonus is a decrease in the loss of money and productivity that is a result of this congestion.
Luis: We don't really need this, we already have radios that provide drivers with traffic reports.
AC
A: if we implement this system, the cars won't breakdown anymore. this is providing an AC that is outlandish. just because a highway system changes doesn't mean your car's suspension system will last forever.
B: mentions traffic lights which are not mentioned anywhere in the passage or even referred to.
C: makes the assumption that the traffic congestion mentioned can be improved. if the congestion is way past the point where a change in highway systems wouldn't make a difference, Eva's argument falls apart.
D : who cares about different systems in different cities. that doesn't matter.
E: weakens the argument because it states that any old vehicle would not be able to integrate with/ benefit from this smart system.