I really struggle like many in this comment list with the milk, store analogy. For me and most normal people I feel like you would identify the opposite. I would think the store would be the necessary condition because in my mind to buy milk you have to go to the store but you can go to the store without buying milk? I think im getting it more though that because the condition states if i will go to the store I will buy milk. So you know if she goes to the store she must buy milk but she can buy milk and not go to the store? someone please help me get this better

I sort of get it the more I think about it but this worries me for the actual test where I don't know the outcome. I like others in this comment section thought at first we were comparing some cultivars of corn vs most other cultivars of corn and what we were comparing on was which is more closely related to Sorghum. Can someone help me understand this better for future similar questions why this would be incorrect because my argument woudl be that this could also be correct?

Is a referential always a noun. at first I was doing them too general and always missing things. But now I think im over including like for 7 I thought whose would have been a referential referring to the referent of "an organization"?

Can I not just do most of these in terms of domain? Eg. for. number 1

domain: pandas that relocated

drive out poachers --> prosper

/prosper--> /drive out