I took it on Saturday and had LR-RC-RC-LG

Reading the comments, a lot of us had the same RC passages, thankfully they were not too difficult to comprehend for me. However, I am bummed that the games were apparently easy and I feel like I bombed. By then, I the test nerves definitely got to me and I couldn't think. Plus I suddenly got kicked out of my session.

I am debating whether I should retake in January if I get a low score. Is that too late?

The author was assuming that people who live a sedentary lifestyle do so voluntarily, which then directly supports the conclusion. AC C, saying that some people who live a sedentary lifestyle do not do so voluntarily, I believe attacks the assumption the argument makes which would be attacking the support rather than the conclusion itself. The conclusion says that the voluntary choice made places the burden, but since there is no voluntary choice the argument falls apart as it could not even continue. In my opinion, attacking the conclusion would be something saying that those voluntary choices do not place the burden claimed. (Basically a "that's not true"). I am also just learning, so I might be wrong, but this is how I interpreted this lecture. Hope it helps!

I felt as though A made sense, but I chose B too quickly because I thought I remembered a previous lesson where the correct answer was similar to B. In that lesson, the stimulus mentioned something specific doing/being something else and the correct answer was a broader term for the specific thing mentioned doing/being that same thing. I was thinking maybe choice B infers that all things that are not animals do not have volitional powers. Does anyone know if this is what makes it incorrect? If it would have said "some things that are not animals do not have volitional powers" would it have been correct? (assuming that A wasn't there) #help

Congratulations!! Though I don't personally know you, I feel so proud :')