Hello! If anyone could clarify where I’m misunderstanding, I would be so grateful!
So the diagram for this is: (B - banker, A - athlete, L - lawyer)
B —> A
L—> /B (the contrapositive would be B —> /L)
—
So you can conclude A (—s—) /L (some athletes are not lawyers- which I believe is the right answer.)
Taking the contrapositive of the first statement is where I have some issues:
/A —> /B
L —> /B
—
/A (—s—) L
And since some is bidirectional, it seems wrongly to read like B (some non-athletes are lawyers or some lawyers are non- athletes)?
I have the same question. Would "inversely proportional" imply they change at the same rate? Because the stimulus doesn't really speak to how much proportionally oxygen levels and phosphorus levels are related?
#help