- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
My understanding from the last paragraph is that the author is justifying the "mystery" (the low entropy - small, hot, dense conditions) that was raised in the fourth paragraph. The high entropy (cold, empty) condition is already the "most common," so there would be no need to defend it.
To add to your point, I could argue that diverting the drivers attention not only doesn't warrant reduced performance, it could potentially improve the performance (both of which aren't mentioned in the stimulus anyway). For example, the driver could over hear something on the phone that would help avoid an upcoming traffic or accident. The same logic could apply for the other examples you mentioned.
I have asked a former professor for a letter of recommendation and he accepted to write it. I want to send him a package including all the relevant materials for the application. I do not have my personal statement yet, but I thought of writing a reflection notes on what I learned from his class, and how that is going to help me in law school. I couldn't find more information on this, but is this a good idea? Will the notes help the professor in any way while writing the LOR?
My understanding of lines 18-19, and the second paragraph as a whole was that the author finds it somewhat valuable (hence, partial approval/disapproval), but also thinks it "contributes little" to the skills of medical students. I took this as a disapproval of its effect (that is the practical experience of the students). That's what I have difficulty understanding in E.