I sincerely appreciate this advice :) thank you!

loving these RC lessons :)

Does anyone happen to know which LR lessons discuss 'most' meaning over half? (I started RC before finishing LR and I'm going back and forth between the two sections due to limited time)

Click ‘quick view’ its easy to miss as it’s so small. This option can be found under the lesson time. I think 7Sage just recently made this option available for all questions.

congratulations everyone :)

I appreciate when the lessons make a note of how what we're learning applies to law school and/or the legal profession :) #feedback

We are still allowed to have six sheets of scrap paper when taking the LSAT (despite the removal of logic games AKA the Analytical Reasoning section) so you can literally map out the conditionals.

https://www.lsac.org/about/lsac-policies/lsac-candidate-agreement/2024-2025#permitted-items-tc

scroll down to #14

replied in the wrong spot...please delete #admin

I attempted this question prior to watching the video explanation by using the quick view feature. Though I got the correct answer, I still watched the video explanation afterwards and tbh found it to be confusing.

When I attempted it on my own, all I did was map out the conditional relationship and then immediately map out its contrapositive and then the correct answer was clear.

So, if you find the video explanation confusing then I would try mapping out the conditional statement and the contrapositive in a way that makes sense to you as long as the meaning stays the same.

For example, here's what I did:

P > 50 & +25% → /F

F → /P >50 or /P +25%

Gentle reminder: Just because you don't understand something explained in one way does not mean that you won't understand it explained in another way - don't give up.

yes!

Click 'quick view' its easy to miss as it's so small. This option can be found under the lesson time. I think 7Sage just recently made this option available for all questions.

thank you!

okay...the "another good strategy" I mentioned is literally what Kevin says to do in the video lesson. I'm exhausted...plz don't judge me lol.

Low res summaries have been so helpful to me. However, for this question, I think another good strategy, to avoid falling victim to the trap of searching for each answer choice in the passage, would be to first read through all of the answer choices (before going hunting at all) to see if anything jumps out at you as not properly describing the view held by Snell. If I had done that then I would have been able identify B as the correct answer choice much quicker and without having to refer back to the passage at all.

I think it makes a lot of sense. This is a strategy suggested in LR. I would say this strategy is even more beneficial in RC as you get 5-8 questions per RC passage.

Getting tired of seeing all these negative comments...

I, for one, am grateful to Kevin for creating these video lessons. I was nervous about the RC section, but after watching just this first video lesson, I am hopeful that I can get the RC section down.

Kevin, thank you for time & efforts and for not having an annoying voice haha. #feedback

For those of you complaining that these video lessons have just recently become available, chill.

If you're super close to taking the LSAT, I can see how the timing of these lessons becoming available is frustrating. Still, Kevin and every other person creating content for 7Sage are only human.

I would think that more people would be appreciative of the fact that 7Sages cares about putting out quality content.

Rant over. Thank you for reading :)

I wish I could thank J.Y.'s mother for birthing him

A job well done!! Thank you for sharing.

time stamp 3:23 - J.Y. says 'only' is a group 3 indicator but it is listed under group 2 indicators #feedback

my brain hurts from trying to understand this stimulus

thank you for this response :)

thank you for this response :)

This is definitely a good strategy. Check out the comment below by Chanduell. I would, however, add that despite how good a strategy is the goal should always be to truly understand a question type...just don't lose sight of this.

agreed - well said

yes! J.Y. uses the two interchangeably