User Avatar
andreaefthy813
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
andreaefthy813
Saturday, Jun 26 2021

Thank you, these explanations make a lot of sense!

Can someone explain to me why the answer isn't D?

My thinking was that D has to be assumed because if helmet wouldn't prevent the fatality then there would be no point in requiring the helmet since they would just be dead anyway? Morbid thinking but...

Stimulus:

Head injury is the most serious type of injury sustained in motorcycle accidents. The average cost to taxpayers for medical care for nonhelmeted motorcycle-accident victims is twice that for their helmeted counterparts. Jurisdictions that have enacted motorcycle-helmet laws have reduced the incidence and severity of accident-related head injuries, thereby reducing the cost to taxpayers. Therefore, to achieve similar cost reductions, other jurisdictions should enact motorcycle-helmet laws. For the same reason jurisdictions should also require helmets for horseback riders, since horseback-riding accidents are even more likely to cause serious head injury than motorcycle accidents are.

Which one of the following is an assumption upon which the author's conclusion concerning helmets for horseback riders depend?

(A) Medical care for victims of horseback-riding accidents is financial drain on tax funds.

(B) The higher rate of serious head injury suffered by victims of horseback-riding accidents is due to the difference in size between horses and motorcycles.

(C) The medical costs associated with treating head injuries are higher than those for other types of injury.

(D) Most fatalities resulting from horseback-riding and motorcycle accidents could have been prevented if the victims had been wearing helmets.

(E) When deciding whether to enact helmet laws for motorcyclists and horseback riders, the jurisdiction's primary concerns is the safety of its citizens.

Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"

User Avatar

Wednesday, Jul 21 2021

andreaefthy813

"most helpful in evaluating"

Anyone have any tips on how to tackle these questions? Usually goes: which one of the following would be most useful in evaluating the argument made. I've been trying to identify an assumption and pick the answer choice that is relevant to that assumption but it's working 50/50.

PrepTests ·
PT116.S3.Q19
User Avatar
andreaefthy813
Sunday, Jul 18 2021

Couldn't find a response to 2ndTimestheCharm questions: "I was fooled by C here because I thought it provided an alternative explanation for why the effects were minor in the past versus devastating today. As in, instead of it being due to lack of diversity, it was due to the prior crops being more disease-resistant. But maybe that falls apart because it only says “some crops,” which could be very few?" #help

PrepTests ·
PT117.S2.Q14
User Avatar
andreaefthy813
Thursday, Jul 15 2021

#help can someone tell me what is wrong with answer choice E here? Why is the logic not set up as Car sales Low or res slump → economy good? I thought E would be the contrapositive of this.

Confirm action

Are you sure?