User Avatar
anjkumar87857
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar
•

Thursday, Jun 14, 2018

anjkumar87857

PT7.S2.G3 - Each of seven judges voted for

Hi team,

A quick question about JY's reasoning on this one:

One of his sub-game boards reads:

In: C/L

Out: C/L

Floaters: M/M/L

But wouldn't the contrapositive of the first rule make this untrue?

M/M --> C/C/L

not M/not M --> not C/not C/not L

So, the correct sub-game board would be:

In: C/L/M

Out: C/L/M

Floater: L

Am I missing something?

Admin note: edited title

https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-7-section-2-game-3/

0

Hi all,

I'm struggling with the translation of "cannot."

In an In/Out game if A & B "cannot" be together, then:

  • is A (--) not B and B (--) not A (or rather, is a biconditional relationship necessarily created)? because they are always apart/never together?
  • In a Grouping game, if A & B "cannot" be together, then:

  • is a negate necessary the only result? - is A ---> not B and B --> A?
  • 0

    Confirm action

    Are you sure?