User Avatar
anjkumar87857
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar

Thursday, Jun 14 2018

anjkumar87857

PT7.S2.G3 - Each of seven judges voted for

Hi team,

A quick question about JY's reasoning on this one:

One of his sub-game boards reads:

In: C/L

Out: C/L

Floaters: M/M/L

But wouldn't the contrapositive of the first rule make this untrue?

M/M --> C/C/L

not M/not M --> not C/not C/not L

So, the correct sub-game board would be:

In: C/L/M

Out: C/L/M

Floater: L

Am I missing something?

Admin note: edited title

https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-7-section-2-game-3/

0

Hi all,

I'm struggling with the translation of "cannot."

In an In/Out game if A & B "cannot" be together, then:

  • is A (--) not B and B (--) not A (or rather, is a biconditional relationship necessarily created)? because they are always apart/never together?
  • In a Grouping game, if A & B "cannot" be together, then:

  • is a negate necessary the only result? - is A ---> not B and B --> A?
  • 0

    Confirm action

    Are you sure?