I thought the main conclusion in this question was "These emergencies could be avoided if Springhill would introduce permanent economic incentives for water conservation." I still got the answer correct, but am concerned I didn't properly identify the conclusion. Can anyone explain why the conclusion is that "Springhill discourages conservation" to me?

That's a great idea! Thanks!

Thanks! Appreciate your thoughts on how to navigate this (obviously not ideal) situation!

Do you have to apply for fee waivers? How did y'all receive them? Was it just a totally random email?

Thanks for asking this! I was worried that it was maybe a scam email and so hadn't clicked on the link. Seems like real, though, if y'all got it too!

@ thanks for the support. let's stay strong!!

Thanks for advice @! I like the idea of practicing my logic intuition in my brain instead of just going straight to lawgic to work out the answer. Maybe that will also help me see the correct translations?

@ said:

@ Upstate NY is so amazing. I grew up near Watertown... I've definitely toyed with the idea of trying to make it out to Ithaca just to check out Cornell even though it isn't on my list. I miss that part of the country often, despite being a Midwesterner at heart now.

@ I'm glad to hear that about WUSTL. I've been meaning to drive out there to check it out, but I've just been a little sketched out by it being in St. Louis haha.

@, I went to WUSTL for undergrad. It's a beautiful campus in a really lovely area of St. Louis - right next to the biggest urban park in the country! (It's even bigger than Central Park!) If you're thinking WUSTL, I highly highly recommend visiting -- I think you'll be really pleasantly surprised. And I say this as someone who grew up in CA and was surprised myself by how much I loved STL :)