My course expires tomorrow and I'm trying to extend my course, but it says I do not have a full course and to either purchase a full course or log-in. I am logged in. I log-in again anyway... but it still says the same thing. If I purchase the extension is it going to properly credit my account? I don't want to loose my materials.
I have the same problem and I have also been going over the stimulus/answers, and the comments many times trying to figure out what I have done incorrectly. I translate answer D just as you have "I-->/A" and from reading the stimulus and answers this seems to be correct without using lawgic... but once I use lawgic this isn't "working out". The only way I can make this "work" is If the first sentence is ignored completely and then...
/SH (story hour) –> I (parents inconvenienced) [A-->B]
[B-->C]
/A (tax reduction adopted) [C]
So the answer we would be looking for is I-->/A, answer D.
But I do not know why the first sentence would be ignored, and I'm sure my thinking is flawed in some way, but I cannot make it work otherwise (because I cannot figure out how /I-->/SH-->/A is answered by the answer that is I-->/A). Or perhaps the first sentence is regards to "the proposed tax reduction package" where the answer choice D it is simply "tax reduction package" and thus similar, but not quite right (more like a pseudo SA question?)... or its just an odd question because its an older test?
I would love to hear from someone that can explain it to me at a level I can understand :) as I seem to be missing something!
I agree with the rest... Istudied powerscore before finding this site also and my test scores went DOWN from week to week. I also went from natural intuition on answering a lot of the LR questions correctly to freezing and trying to figure out the process they coach that I was getting everything wrong. I took 4 mos off and re-started with 7sage, and I am back to feeling confident in my answer choices and better yet understanding why I am wrong on the others!
I'm having same issue understanding this one. Is it more like a PSA question? Or can you dumb down an answer, cause I'm not understanding the lawgic on this one. Reading it straight I can get the correct answer and it makes sense, but translating to lawgic and then formulaicly doing sufficient assumption to get to the answer is throwing me off completely. Thanks in advance!!