Me TOO!

is it a common sense assumption to assume in E that bc their curries have more turmeric that the Indian elderly population eat it?

I can understand why C is the correct answer, but can someone explain why E isnt? I think the conditional is saying if samantha is the killer then she did not leave behind finger or footprints. So to conclude that she is the killer, we must add the trigger of her not leaving behind her fingerprint.

I chose A because the distinction the first speaker made was: unauthorized access AND manipulating data, the second speaker only spoke about unauthorized access. How do you reconcile such a distinction.

How is B not trying to deny a fact.

why is case by case situation not the same as more than one factor but rather the same as general rule?

Asking yourself why C would disagree pushes you to think about what he is actually saying. He is saying the public opinion is not a good indicator of its existence because it is not the opinion of the general public but rather the skeptics. But I have the same confusion as you, I think they are an intersecting sect. I made the distinction to justify this answer though by explaining that the general public does NOT include Cultural elites. And I think that distinction is a fair assumption. But I, nonetheless, also chose B lol.

why is the only if not recognized as a biconditional and instead a conditional?