> @7sagestudentservices said:

> I think for a situation like this context matters and the moderators will take that into consideration.

>

> >@alejoroarios925 said:

> > For rule #10, what if the person did not intend to be yelling but their keyboard was broken? Or what if they did not know the social keyboard etiquette and just typed in all caps (I know of some people lol). Do they still violate the policy off an assumption that they are yelling? Love the rules though, you guys are great!

>

>

That's true. But how would they prove that the person is telling the truth? Because I saw a comment written in all caps and then a moderator replied back saying to not write in caps as it is against the policy. But honestly the comment that commenter made was just a normal reply to someone, it was just written all in caps. So it is likely that he wasn't yelling and it seems that the policy doesn't allow all caps because of it implying yelling. I just felt bad for the commenter lol, totally redundant to even discuss lol! :smile:

For rule #10, what if the person did not intend to be yelling but their keyboard was broken? Or what if they did not know the social keyboard etiquette and just typed in all caps (I know of some people lol). Do they still violate the policy off an assumption that they are yelling? Love the rules though, you guys are great!

I would take care of your health. The LSAT changed to unlimited tries from its previous restricted amount.

On a website called lawstudents.ca I read a post about a guy that wrote the LSAT 6 times and still got into law school. School and the test will always be there but your health is something that is far more important. Stay happy and strong, study longer and take it when you are at your best.

aren't novels books?

@nikitamunjal950 said:

That's an interesting question. I think the point of this question - which you totally understood - was negating the comparison. "Not as serious" into "just as serious or more serious."

While technically "some" could mean "all" I think this would be one of those context situations where we have to understand drug related crime as a whole as opposed to discussing at least one form of drug-related crime, like possession. Because what we are negating is not the quantity of a thing but the quality or a characteristic (seriousness) of a thing. We are denying this person's claim of the relationship that exists between drug-related crime and what the mayor claims. To suggest that, "some drug related crime is as serious, or more serious, of a problem for the city as the mayor claims it is" leaves open the possibility that there could be at least one form of drug related crime that is not a serious of a problem for the city as the mayor claims and leaving that possibility open would mean that we are not fully negating this statement.

Hope that helps!

Hey! That helps so much, thanks a lot! :)

Thanks so much!! :smile: