Well i speedran through the cc and the variety in the number of questions was initially pretty difficult for me to properly adjust to, given that the methods listed in the cc are somewhat distinct from each other. I tried a section and struggled. However, now that I consciously take note of the main point, premise, and maybe some implied basis for support, the questions just seem to be going right for me. I'm still not where I want to be, but it's a start. Has anyone else been where I am? If so, has this method of just having an insane focus on the mp, premise, and support been of greater use to you than using conditional logic, especially in questions where it gets particularly tricky to use cl?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
there's a simpler explanation. The argument being talked about writing for pleasure, the premise talks about the books providing pleasure. The NA simply provides that link. This question could have been answered in less than two minutes...
I honestly do not like how needlessly long the explanation videos are tbh
@rachellater580 said:
how long have you all been studying for august 2022?
Around a couple months
I'm interested, also testing in August, also on EST, also aiming for the mid 170's, currently averaging ~170, with a high score of 178.
pcb is the alternative hypothesis. P brevis is the original. You got it right in the later half of the comment!
@somedayillflyaway698 said:
lol wtf. Um... where did you get that from? Pretty sure those terms dont mean what you think they mean.
It was a joke bud. I played on the mechanistic approaches to logical diagraming. You must be fun at parties.
I am really just speculating at this point, but there was a significant inflation of LSAT scores on the last two cycles which has led to many law schools rejecting splitters who would have earlier been considered solid applicants.
Argument is flawed because it confuses a condition sufficient for an event to occur with one necessary for it to occur
well the government stepping in is a necessary condition for the problem to be solved. On that basis alone the answer choice can be eliminated
@matthewcsorrels859 said:
@aryankr1701249 said:
I would actually advise you on the contrary, just to add some nuance and provide my own experience. I have found that practice tests do a lot more to increase your understanding of the material than the core curriculum. Hence, while getting your feet with and developing an understanding of the core curriculum is good, I would advise you to start taking the earlier practice tests sooner than later.
This advice may very well work better for you, @bellelross677. Different things work for different people!
Well yeah, I just wanted to provide nuance. What worked for me might still work for other folks
Well it depends, is 152 your diagnostic? Is it an official score? Either way, you should be able to get a 160 by August
I would actually advise you on the contrary, just to add some nuance and provide my own experience. I have found that practice tests do a lot more to increase your understanding of the material than the core curriculum. Hence, while getting your feet with and developing an understanding of the core curriculum is good, I would advise you to start taking the earlier practice tests sooner than later.
Okay I need someone to answer this for me. Here's why i picked B: prior to last year, there was a downward trend. The sales manager does say that sales increased last year. Hence, reversing that downward trend. If the topic of discussion is desirability, that perfectly weakens the argument, doesn't it? #help
Ohh so the entire thing was about having the gill disease vs being harmed by it
i crossed out B since it said unrefined gold was the source of SOME refined gold. The stimulus tells us that only Senegalese gold was not refined. Hence, wouldn't the source for ALL refined gold be unrefined gold?#help
i swear to god if i fall for the words LEAST or EXCEPT again...
practice??