I am confused about A. Doesn't this require us to make an assumption that every employed person whose spending is undiminished has debt? What about people who don't have debt? It can be argued against this AC, that I don't have debt why is the amount of money in my savings account still the same?

#help

I am facing a similar problem. I keep coming to different topics but decide against it because I read an article in new york times about over sharing in college essays and how it can be viewed negatively by Adcoms.

So I am finding it hard to strike proper balance between oversharing and still being able to share personal stories.

I can't particularly offer any help with changing the way you think on specific questions. But I usually try to reduce the stimulus into simple language.

With RRE questions I just turn the entire argument into 1 question and try to look for an answer for that question. So for this question, I asked myself, Why did the doctors recommend pregnant women to eat nutritious diet? AC C offers an answer by saying because babies of women who don't eat it will have more diseases.

But I understand where you are coming from, even I eliminated AC B in the same manner, but when I realised that AC C answers my question, I immediately chose it and realised that AC B has other major discrepancy.

The key to LSAT I feel, is to be more flexible with your strategy.

Hope this helps!

This is how I did it. The negation by JY confused me a little.

Conclusion is contemporary poets who write formal poetry (CPF) DO NOT perform PCA (/PCA)

Premise is CPF are politically progressive feminists (PPF) .

CPF → PPF

CPF → /PCA

So PPF → /PCA. Which is given as AC (c)

#help Does this sort of negation lead to wrong answers in other questions?

#help

Should you draw the conditionals for LR during the exam?