User Avatar
austi4786
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
austi4786
Thursday, Sep 23 2021

Depending on the score you want, where you're currently scoring and the schools you want to apply to. January would be the last date to take it for any school whose due date is in February. Other schools have March deadline and some schools have deadlines later into the spring/summer until late July. Taking It in January will give u 3.5 months to study, which is a decent amount of time.

PrepTests ·
PT102.S4.Q11
User Avatar
austi4786
Thursday, Sep 16 2021

Help me... here's what I got

Assumption: No other reasons why they should follow the so called experts.

What would weaken the argument would be something that has reason why they should follow the experts.

so there will be 4 answers that will give rise to that and the one that doesn't will be the correct answer choice.

So can someone explain to me how C weakens. because to me I read it as a reason they shouldn't follow the experts because shows performance stocks was measured by dividends and the market was measured by share value. I took this as the experts weren't consistent in calculation as a reason u shouldn't follow them.

Maybe I'm understanding this wrong... I'm so confused. #help

PrepTests ·
PT110.S2.Q17
User Avatar
austi4786
Wednesday, Sep 15 2021

With this one I found the assumption for the first part to be that these lab animals And North Americans were similar and/or connected in some sort of way. Based on the conclusion of the researcher, I determined her assumption was they are not similar/connected. Therefore in order to weaken the argument, the answer would be something that would make the lab animals and the North Americans similar. Hence Answer A.

Did anyone else get to the answer choice in this manner?

#help (Added by Admin)

PrepTests ·
PT105.S2.Q4
User Avatar
austi4786
Wednesday, Sep 15 2021

So did anyone pay attention to the wording that says "CAN CAUSE" meaning it doesn't have to but it can.. and in answer choice B "The carcinogenic effect of THC "COULD BE" neutralized by other ingredients. doesn't mean it will, but it could. I figured the argument is assuming a piece(THC) is equivalent to the whole(marijuana). So something that would weaken the argument would say something about "THC not being the whole(marijuana) and/or THC not causing cancer in some way" Did anyone else use that formatting to get to the answer or am I completely off key with this?

#help (Added by Admin)

User Avatar
austi4786
Tuesday, Jan 11 2022

I am also interested. How can we all connect?

User Avatar
austi4786
Tuesday, Oct 05 2021

There is a girl on tiktok named @.gal She took LSAT 3 times last year (2020) (August, November and January 2021). She applied to schools from December to January. She got into Yale, and 5 other T-14 schools. Accepted into 8/13 schools she applied to! Anything is possible!

PrepTests ·
PT107.S3.Q9
User Avatar
austi4786
Wednesday, Nov 03 2021

I cancelled A & B because they were talking about "peaches" and the stimulus didn't talk about peaches and cancelled D & E because they were talking about "neighboring districts" also wasn't mentioned in the stimulus. Leaving C with the only possible correct answer. Did anyone else narrow the answer choices like this?

Confirm action

Are you sure?