- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Help me... here's what I got
Assumption: No other reasons why they should follow the so called experts.
What would weaken the argument would be something that has reason why they should follow the experts.
so there will be 4 answers that will give rise to that and the one that doesn't will be the correct answer choice.
So can someone explain to me how C weakens. because to me I read it as a reason they shouldn't follow the experts because shows performance stocks was measured by dividends and the market was measured by share value. I took this as the experts weren't consistent in calculation as a reason u shouldn't follow them.
Maybe I'm understanding this wrong... I'm so confused. #help
With this one I found the assumption for the first part to be that these lab animals And North Americans were similar and/or connected in some sort of way. Based on the conclusion of the researcher, I determined her assumption was they are not similar/connected. Therefore in order to weaken the argument, the answer would be something that would make the lab animals and the North Americans similar. Hence Answer A.
Did anyone else get to the answer choice in this manner?
#help (Added by Admin)
So did anyone pay attention to the wording that says "CAN CAUSE" meaning it doesn't have to but it can.. and in answer choice B "The carcinogenic effect of THC "COULD BE" neutralized by other ingredients. doesn't mean it will, but it could. I figured the argument is assuming a piece(THC) is equivalent to the whole(marijuana). So something that would weaken the argument would say something about "THC not being the whole(marijuana) and/or THC not causing cancer in some way" Did anyone else use that formatting to get to the answer or am I completely off key with this?
#help (Added by Admin)
I am also interested. How can we all connect?
There is a girl on tiktok named @.gal She took LSAT 3 times last year (2020) (August, November and January 2021). She applied to schools from December to January. She got into Yale, and 5 other T-14 schools. Accepted into 8/13 schools she applied to! Anything is possible!
I cancelled A & B because they were talking about "peaches" and the stimulus didn't talk about peaches and cancelled D & E because they were talking about "neighboring districts" also wasn't mentioned in the stimulus. Leaving C with the only possible correct answer. Did anyone else narrow the answer choices like this?
Depending on the score you want, where you're currently scoring and the schools you want to apply to. January would be the last date to take it for any school whose due date is in February. Other schools have March deadline and some schools have deadlines later into the spring/summer until late July. Taking It in January will give u 3.5 months to study, which is a decent amount of time.