Really? So no one knows what's the right answer before reviewing ? That's going to be one long review then. But okay. When's our first meeting? Do we have a date yet? Thanks Forest for organizing this!

Yes 4 pm EST sounds perfect! That's like 6 am in my time, which is perfect because I can get this BR done first then go to work.

Do we do PT separately then BR together? Or do we do PT together as well?

Yes. So a PT/week?

Send me a message too! I want to be in 170+ club as well.

Hey I'm down too! Let's really do this. I mean let's really stick to the schedule hard. And make this work. So everyone in the group could get that dream result!!!!

Hey I'm down too. I'm in late 160s as well. I'm in a different country though but depending on your chosen time to skype, I'm pretty sure I could join without a problem. I want to stick with a strict schedule doing perhaps 3 PTs a week. 1.5 PT per day (6 sections).

If we could set up the times--at least 4 days (two for PTs and the other two for review) per a week, that'd be great.

If you didn’t take the test, it doesn’t count toward that limit.

The more I study LSAT the more I'm impressed by how well written this test is. I'm surprised how many times I think the right answer is wrong, but then there's always that clear and very straight forward reason why the right is right and the wrong is wrong. Great test. But hurts me a little... :neutral:

you can use control f in RC???

Do not write LSAT at a hotel. Your wifi will be terrible. I've tried and it was a disaster. Now I have to write it in October.

Same as mine. Super harc rc—reasonable lr—-easy lg

@ said:

@ said:

Did anyone have human rights/silk in Colombia/Locke/bipedalism on RC? Thought it was pretty dense and basically ran out of time! I can be anywhere between -0 to -6 on RC though, so it's hard to judge... hoping the other sections balance me out and that there's a nice curve...

I had that RC too--it was brutal for me! It was my first section and I couldn't find a rhythm at all so I am quite nervous about how many I got wrong...

lol spit my water reading yo comment. Thanks. :smiley:

I like your idea Cant Get Right. To think that NAQs is like conditional-MBTQs. That's brilliant!

Thank you Keets993.

Perfect. Thank you Dr. Brown!

Okay just to really finish my understanding, so when there is "no" in front of A, it's the B that will be negated while it is A that will be negated when there is "not' in front of it?

no A equals B----> A->/B

not A equals B----> /A->B

Thanks Lucas. That surely helped. Thanks a ton!

Hey Yes that's what I thought too. But I was just browsing through Manhattan Prep for PT 9 stuff, the mentor there wrote something like this:

When we convert that "No A are B" into conditional logic, it is the same as saying "All A are ~B".

And that was alarming, because I always thought NoA=B equals NoB=A.

Does someone know what this mentor was talking about?

Nice!!!! Thank you!!

"Breaking into the 160's and 170's requires that you disabuse yourself of the notion that just because you CAN answer every question on the LSAT does not mean you SHOULD TRY to answer every question on the LSAT the SAME WAY."

This. This hits the heart of time management mindset required to ace LSAT. LOVE it!

Check in

OMG This cheat sheet is golden! Thank you so much for sharing!!!! And good luck to your future.

Nice! I will be expecting you two to check in 16 hrs from now! :)

Again, this group 'checks in' not once, not twice a week, but EVERYDAY.

Interested!

happy new year everyone. :)