fully thought question 1 said constipated instead of compensated for way too long :)

For Q5, with the inference we should make considered, I put this for my answer:

decline → corrupt → revolution

/revolution -> /corrupt -> /decline

Would this still be considered correct without specifying who is corrupt?

I am not trying to jump the gun, but I think this will help with my overall understanding of the LSAT. I understand the importance of identifying grammatical components, but I am having trouble getting how this applies to certain LSAT question types. Can anyone help clear this up please, I am very confused. Thank you!!