im in such a groove of pt and blind review that i want to blind review my real test in case i need to take it again
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I've been going through the PT'S sequentially since pt 36. Got my best score on the last one I took which was pt64 and then yesterday i took pt 65. What was that!? Two 5star rc passages, extremely unusual lr questions, it was a nightmare. Did anyone else take this pt and halfway through felt like they've never taken a pt before?
like farzana said, youll get to a point in your lsat studying where necessary assumption questions start to feel like must be true questions. approach them like that , and youll have an easier time finding the right answer
ive been in the workforce for a while, im 28 and applying to law school in october. i have solid academic rec letters from professors but do i also need one from my job's manager? or is that superfluous?
tags are im assuimg the stems ? lr question types are fungible, on my last pt i got a PSA question right even thoug i thought it was a strengthen. that is because my mind was oriented toward strong validating answer choices, so the PSA answer choice worked. this isnt always the case but its a good reminder that questions stems are just asking you to perform different operations on the same body
great question. its complicated....on rc i woud read every answer choice. but not on lr. any question on lr that is MBT, MBF, PSA, SA, NA you do not need to read every answer. there is a kind of unequivocal true or false, right or wrong construction to those questions. on the others i would read each answer choice. i struggle with this myself becuse sometimes i think ii would have been right to read each answer and other times it does me a disservice. this comes with prac
what the other users are saying is that even if you say with your hands folded for the entire test while the clock was running, a score below 120 would not be possible
Well definitely don't take it again for a while. Do the CC and take PT's for a while. I sort of did what you did back in 2021. I took the test twice and got 144 then 146. It was a dumb decision because I knew very little about the test and took it anyway. Now my PT scores are low 160s and I'm gearing up to take it in September
I use a yellow legal pad and g207 blue ink pens. I go through each answer choice, writing out why I did or did not pick that answer choice
I'm a low 160s scorer and I still diagram anything conditional. It takes some time but you end up saving time because, when you finish the diagram, you hunt for the correct must be true or must be false answer choice. You dont need to read every answer choice at that point.
In conclusion, you can continue to diagram anything conditional and still answer the question faster than the 7sage target times. It's just a matter of how fast you can find the right answer and move on once the diagram is finished
Because PSA questions aren't formulaic like SA or MBT. So when you draw a contrapositive, it's a (soft) contrapositive. So the reason you csnt say something could be morally right contrapositively on a PSA is because you're only entitled to conclude that something "isn't morally bad" or is morally neutral
she was cute as a button. her and henry were debating normative statements on the last 7sage podcast she was on and she gave some very clever response to one of his points. it was toward the end of the episode, something about "just because i can doesnt mean i should" or something like that
move out of DC, maybe out to virginia, and go to a law school there. plenty of quality schools will take a score of 165 which is a stout performance. richmond, uva, regent, george mason etc. one of those schools will take you
i was all the way through the old core curriculum when the new version of 7sage came out with all the new prep tests. i have been testing from pt 36 all the way up to pt 61 using the old format but now i want to take pt62-pt94 using the new preptests. however, it doesnt look like the new preptests work that way. would it be okay for me to just continue taking 3 sections of pt 62-94, while adding on an old section for each preptests myself? i like doing the prep tests sequentially, like 62, 63, 64 , 65 etc. i also like how jy ping adds commentary every 4 or 5 prep tests using students live takes and i dont want to lose that.
for someone who has been prep testing sequentially all the way since pt 36, how can i continue to do this while also adding in a 4th section in the most realistic way possible? thank you
My last 4 pt's have been on average a score of 159. The law school I want to go to has a median lsat of 159. Should I keep PT'ing over the spring and summer and take the test in September and apply in October of this year? At what point would I want to get my recommendation letters and other loose ends of my application tied up? What scores should I be seeing before I stop PT's and sign up for the real thing? Thanks
@saniquerowe thank you for the response, I understand. One other question I have is do you recommend I take 4 full sections when I am doing my prepetests? 3 scored sections and one section from the old preptests to simulate the experimental section?
@bpp000007598 did you try it when you took the test?
Narcissistic abuse is , according to you, correlated with lower lsat PT scores. Therefore, the abuse causes the lower scores. Maybe the causation is reversed? Maybe your lower test scores caused your mood to plummet which made you more vulnerable to that abuse? Or perhaps there's a third factor causing both the Narcissistic abuse and the lower scores on your PT's? It's worth thinking about , correlative conclusions are often specious
If I identify the experimental section properly could I use it as a 35 minute break? Knowing that it's not going to be scored? Is this a good or bad idea for my test day? Let me know. Thank you
Hi, I am reading Thinking Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman and he's talked about "conjunction fallacies" and "base rate fallacies" which are reminding me of some lsat questions I've seen before in logical reasoning. Does 7sage cover these fallacies at all in any explanation videos? They're definitely trickier than standard source attack or equivocation fallacies, and they are hard to understand sometimes. It seems like you need to know Bayes theorem to fully understand some of these concepts and I don't have any background in statistical math or probability theory
As soon as I read the stimulus under time conditions, I knew the explanation was gonna be hilarious
@ntrepanier5164 Cooley law school, that's hilarious. We've all been there, bombing a PT and thinking 'at least I could still get into widener or cooley"
In my experience , easy to medium level MSS questions always have an incredibly weak answer as the correct answer. But hard mss questions will have the correct answer be some tiny reference to one sentence in the stimulus or sometimes even half the sentence. It's very sneaky but it ends up making sense when you blind review the answer choices for the question!
In my experience , easy to medium level MSS questions always have an incredibly weak answer as the correct answer. But hard mss questions will have the correct answer be some tiny reference to one sentence in the stimulus or sometimes even half the sentence. It's very sneaky but it ends up making sense when you blind review the answer choices for the question!
True stuff !