yea this one has to be omitted

the sad part is that I understood what the flaw was even before getting to the choices but finding the right way to word it is why I got it wrong because the LSAT has to use fancy vocab...

what?

i got it right but i thought this was a sufficient assumption question....

@ said:

Woooo congrats! Also, I want a red bull now.

couldnt of done it without you. If you are ever on the east coast, ill buy you a 4 pack of red bull, its on me haha.

@ said:

Took it as well, only improved by 2 points. Taking this as motivation for the April test. Thanks, Brandon. See you on the other side!

you got this!

Same but Im just taking the February test. From what Ive been told, anything past February is considered late like sending everything in in February is considered on time and everything after February is late. Unless all of your apps are complete and you just need the score I personally would wait but thats just me. If you can send it off on the last day of February go for it but if you still need time to work on your personal statement, rec letters, other statements and general app questions, this is just me but I would personally apply next cycle. However, its not unheard of getting in after February nor is it extremely rare. Its just by February 90% of the law schools seats are full.

if I get a level 4 question difficulty as question #1 on the lsat im done

this one was kinda dumb ngl but its from 1998 so..

what?

i had no idea what was going on in this question tbh. got it right tho somehow.

this question is the definition of a time sink imo. i got it right but the damn thing took me like 4 mins to solve.

what?

im gonna be honest I had no idea what the question was talking about which made it a little hard. something about fabric and window treatments but just did the contrapositive and D worked out.

Also I've been doing 2 to 3 PT's a week so it could be burnout but section 2 went so poorly that im not even sure if i can blame it on burnout.

i didnt find any support for ABC and D but when i got to E i couldnt find any support for it either so i just left it blank lol

ngl after getting this wrong and looking at the curve. I was this close from just not doing anything for an entire week.

I got #15 correct but its a horrible question like genuinely. old news literally means its old and isnt a recent development...

this one was so weird i have no idea what to say tbh

I got this question right but it took me like 3 minutes to choose between A and D. The reason why is the premise doesnt actually support the conclusion. The premise talks about the aftermath of what would happen if a satellite collision DID happen, not why a collision is likely to increase. It mentions nothing about WHY the chances would increase. Bad question imo.

yea i was sitting there and picked D and noticed it was question # 19 and was like "aint no way it was this easy, something is horribly wrong or doesnt feel right." But started to overthink and just picked D and moved on. C L E A R L Y something was indeed wrong lol.

The word apparently threw me off even tho I still picked A. In the question it said reasonably and it just messed me up a little.

What does it matter if movie songs get played thousands of times, its not like the artist is making money off of it because they still got paid an up front amount. If they choose to write a movie sing they get paid a single amount. so why must it be true that a movie song gets played thousands of times. its not like they will make money from it?

not gonna lie when I was reading answer choice E out loud i laughed. dont ask why

i crossed B out for a different reason. I still got it right and was mainly between A and C but I crossed B out because even though the english version differed from the original, he still could of modeled it off of the idea itself so thats why I got rid of B.