User Avatar
brettbaalhorn435
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
brettbaalhorn435
Saturday, Aug 19 2017

Thank you, @ and @ ! I keep finding in "Strengthen+/Weaken+" question types such as these that the English is generally more intuitive for me. @ , like you said, outside of parallel reasoning/flaw questions, it's easier for me to understand ideas in English than it is to represent them abstractly. That said, I also feel that I should be more easily able to apply symbols to ideas in a way that makes sense to me. This will especially be true when LGs rear their ugly heads. I appreciate the input from each of you and wish you both the best. Do your best to enjoy the rest of the weekend (and, if able, the eclipse on Monday!)

-Brett.

1
User Avatar
brettbaalhorn435
Friday, Aug 18 2017

Thank you, @! I shall start there and see where I am truly lacking or whether there is just something small that is failing to click that is holding me back. I appreciate the suggestions. I think my main problem is determining what to use as symbols for the Lawgic translations. I diagram the Lawgic (or try to) and end up confusing myself even more. Thank you for your assistance and have a swell weekend!

1
User Avatar

Friday, Aug 18 2017

brettbaalhorn435

Strengthen/PSA/SA questions...

G'day, 7sagers!

I have a hard time diagramming the logic in these questions but seem to be doing OK without diagramming and just going by the English alone. Will this ever come back and bite me in the arse? Should I work on getting better at mapping out the formal logic? I feel like my main issue is determining what to use as symbols in translating the English to lawgic. I tend to do better on LR than any other section, but still have room to improve. I also have difficulty with LG and feel that this may be an issue in that case. Any suggestions/ideas are appreciated!

-Brett.

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?