@cciatta375 said:

@brianhoaglund242 said:

Tehy won't even accept or look at a candidate under 165

Given that only two Canadian law schools (So far as I can tell) list an average LSAT at or above 165, your claim is demonstrably false.

While true, you can get in with some places with lower than 165, I can't afford to move across the country for school. I think if you were in my shoes you'd understand better.

And from what I know about Canada vs. USA, schools here are steadily increasing their medians each year and unlike the USA, we have very few schools

Unlike the US, Canadian schools have a harder entry standard. They won't even accept or look at a candidate under 165.

Again, this claim is demonstrably false, as I said.

Tehy won't even accept or look at a candidate under 165

Given that only two Canadian law schools (So far as I can tell) list an average LSAT at or above 165, your claim is demonstrably false.

It's unfortunate that you're down, but this is a totally learnable test and improving is almost certainly within your ability. Best of luck with wherever life takes you.

Totally depends on your GPA and target schools. 1.5 points below you average PT is perfectly normal variance. Without more info I cannot give you a particularly definitive answer, so absent that, what's the harm in taking the test again (And studying in the meantime)?

The thing that makes AC A for 13 seem so terrible to me is that we know that Earth is a planet, and we know that Mars is a planet. The passage doesn't mention cratering on Earth, so why should we expect cratering on Mars? Surely we have more info on Earth, and we know that D at least weakens the premise slightly. What a terrible question.