Was your diagnostic using flex scoring? or was the 155 using all four sections towards the score
Mine went similar. I got a 156 cold without blind review. Now i'm a month or so in and doing much better on LR (i got -18 across the two sections).
I just finished the principle reasoning section, and I'm wondering if I should go back and redo the lawgic lessons. I still find myself really struggling with the forms (and wanting to use them when I attempt to answer the questions). Has anyone had the same problem? Or has anyone gone back and redone the lessons?
BTW I plan to take the LSAT for the first time in April
I'd be interested!
I'd love to join!
Does anyone know if this got off the ground? If so, I would love to join
I submitted evidence of past accommodations in a school setting (504/IEP), approval for accommodations on other standardized tests, a note indicating I am currently receiving accommodations (in college), and a medical note indicating my diagnosis.
I just received my accommodations for the LSAT. Although my situation is very different from yours, I would say that you definitely want someone qualified to give a diagnosis, indicate that you have a need for accommodations. I am pretty sure there is an appeals process in case you don't get approved the first time around, so make sure you complete the forms ASAP.
Hi! I made a discord for people planning on taking the April and/or June LSAT.
Feel free to join https://discord.gg/P2uRQKyT
So is B correct because it is the only option that is directly challenging the conclusion ("In light of this testimony"), made from the premise ("experts say")? #help (Added by admin)
I'm also a junior looking at taking the lsat on these dates! Would love to join
I eliminated B first because I have only really heard of divine in a religious context. So for me, both definitions were similar enough. However, I guess it can also mean something that is 'really good', which I should have known. I think this is really tricky, but it's why the curve is 171.