I know people don't generally make a fuss about the writing portion but what is the best way to prepare?
I know the prompt generally presents two 'criteria' and two 'plans.' Does it matter whether we recognize the criteria or plan as the main point of the argument? For example, do you have to argue that CRITERIA 1 is more important than CRITERIA 2 or PLAN A over PLAN B and consider the criteria - because one could feasibly argue that you are able to achieve both criteria 1 and 2 with one plan (could argue that long-term financial stability will yield the most profits over time). Or is that seen as not being decisive enough with your argument?
Reference: https://www.lsac.org/lsat/lsat-prep/practice-test/writing-sample-topic
#HELP
I have a question about J.Y's explanation of choice A. He read "confuses a condition being required (or a necessary condition)" While the author may have accidentally confused the necessary condition of survival as a sufficient condition, doesn't the word 'required' signify a sufficient condition?
#help