Considering this puppy is allowed, I think you'll be fine: http://www.180watch.com/

I shelled out the money for one myself. Sounds like overkill, I know, but considering that I frequently finish certain sections just barely on time, it's worth it for me to know exactly how many seconds I have left near the end of a section. It's also nice to be able to reset it with the push of a button, and less stressful than trying to wind it back or something in the 30 seconds you get between sections.

Thanks JoeGotBored! Haha yeah, honestly if I don't do better than a 166 it would be a disappointment for me. I'm really hoping to get into a school at the lower end of the T-14 (Georgetown and Northwestern are two I'm hoping to have a shot at), and from what I've gathered, I don't have too much of a chance without at least a 170 (my undergrad GPA was only 3.47, which is okay for a Notre Dame grad, but I figure I'll be going up against Ivy League-ers with 3.8+ GPAs if I apply to Top 14 Schools). Honestly, what throws me off the most on the new tests are the convoluted answer choices and stimuli, as well as the seemingly bigger leaps in logic some of the correct answer choices take, especially on the RC. See, try as I might, I can't seem to get better at the games (I get how to do it but I'm just too slow at them, I've never managed to even attempt more than 3 on a timed section). -7, -8 are honestly solid scores for me on it, and barring a really lucky choice for the letter I choose to bubble for all the answers on the 4th game I don't get to attempt, I pretty much never do better than that. On the older tests, I would make up for it by managing to only get 3-5 questions wrong combined on the other 3 sections, which still allowed me to break 170 regularly, but the newer PTs seemed to slow me down more which meant I had to rush through a few more questions than I'd like at the end, which is usually when I make mistakes.