@
I am interested if you are still accepting people. I am taking the August LSAT.
Interested, if you have availability.
If there are any groups, or individuals, interested, I am looking for a study group to join/start. I have been studying solo for a while and I am taking the upcoming August LSAT.
Again, if anyone is interested, just let me know.
Thank you!
I would like to join as well. Please send link. Thank you.
#claremont
This does help. Thank you very much!
Good Evening, Everyone.
Can someone please share some knowledge with me revolving around question 12 of PT.33? My specific question pertains to understanding the written logic, which is used to solve the question.
The lawgic is /S --> J --> H --> /G --> /W. There is an “M” below the J pointing to the H as well; however, what is confusing to me is drawing an arched arrow backward from the H to the /S. Once I have done that, how the lawgic plays out is confusing to me; and therefore, how the correct answer is reached. I have watched the video on this question more than once and I am still confused.
If anyone can share anything regarding this question, I would appreciated it. I hope my question makes sense.
Thank you!
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question"
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-33-section-4-game-2/
I am interested. Please send discord link. Thank you.
Amazing job! Thank you!
I would say that "few" would not include zero. For the following reasons: Firstly, from my understanding, logically a "few" implies that "some" are, but "most are not". With that being said, "some" has a logical range of 1-100 (100 being All). So, you would have to have at least one of the said things to meet that definition. Secondly, and not to sound redundant, we know that the negation of "some" is "none". Just another piece of evidence to back our claim. I hope this is not confusing and I was able to help.