User Avatar
cabsmith996
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
cabsmith996
Friday, Jun 12 2020

Wow. Thanks for sharing your techniques and feedback, everyone. I had been deciding to skip based on question type (not a fan of parallel flaw or parallel reasoning questions, personally). I thought I had potential to be more confident/efficient in deciding answer choices but this may not be the case as much as focusing on "going slow to go fast" might offer alongside more in-depth review and analysis during blind reviews.

All of you just saved me more time instead of looking for "magic hacks" to shore up my LR score. Thankfully, going slowly through the stimulus was already one change I made a few weeks ago to my LR strategy so I'm going to continue to rely on that and blind review until it yields better results in terms of efficiency and timing. Thanks!

Bonus question if anyone is still paying attention to this thread: How do you deal with under-confidence errors on blind review? Like, when you spend too much time on a question, how do you know which one you spent too much time on?

User Avatar
cabsmith996
Thursday, Jun 11 2020

Seeing a breakdown means seeing a cookie-cutter or generic question/stimulus model, right? So what you’re saying is improvement in speed is largely dependent on drilling certain question types in order to recognize latent patterns.

User Avatar

Thursday, Jun 11 2020

cabsmith996

LR Skipping Strategy: What am I missing?

I'm signed up for the July test, and my primary goals are drilling logic games and taking practice tests. After watching a 7Sage webinar on skipping, I've been inspired to think of the test differently and try something new as a secondary goal. Up to this point, I've been averaging one skip in LR with -5 or -4 in each section. I would like to shave that down to an average of -3 by using a few more skips in exchange for time at the end to go over any other tricky questions. (Essentially, I would like to choose which questions to get incorrect.)

So far, my issue has been trying to rush through the questions to shore up more time by the time I reach the last question. When I do, my accuracy suffers. This is only my first week of trying this new strategy but it does pain me a bit to see my score go down in my drills as a result.

People who have used this method successfully, what am I missing here? Do I simply need more time practicing it? Is five weeks before test day enough time to make it work? Would I be better off doing more blind review to sharpen my conceptual understanding? If more/better BR is the trick, what should I be asking myself to go faster without losing accuracy?

User Avatar
cabsmith996
Thursday, Jul 09 2020

Yeah, definitely take it. July is going to be me third take. I've had test anxiety for the first two and, as a result of the stress, the scores from my final month of study always went down a few points. This all caused me to spiral and lose confidence weeks before test day (lowering my PT average even further).

To avoid that problem this time around, I'm not letting the actual scores dictate my confidence. Even though I under-performed from my previous average this month (as was to be expected), I still have a process that I was able to follow and do well with a month ago. For me, the next few days are about reviewing that process through my notes and by doing basic drills.

Ever since LSAT Flex was announced for the July test, I have been saving the second logical reasoning section for last. My logic here is to try and simulate the experience of a varied, three-section test before completing an "extra" section at the end. That being said, I've struggled to maintain my discipline in the fourth section mostly because I know it won't be there on game day. While I could stand to motivate myself more here, what would be the point, exactly? It's not clear to me how extra time on logical reasoning is necessary in the blind review process if I want to start emphasizing other parts of the test which will now be weighed more heavily than before.

Under its 7Sage Flex Score Calculator, our friends at 7Sage make this recommendation: "... you've already been given the best converter in existence from the LSAC itself: the regular 4 section PrepTest. Take 4 section PTs. That will be the best predictor of how you will do on a 3 section Flex test. On test day, frame the loss of 1 LR section to yourself as a treat: 1 fewer stress inducing nerve-racking task to do."

User Avatar
cabsmith996
Sunday, Sep 01 2019

Can we bring our own pens to use on the paper or are we limited to the stylus?

Confirm action

Are you sure?