Couldn't agree with @ more.

I think broadly too, people get a whole lot more of a return studying LR question types and Games above RC passages. For better or worse, I think RC is probably the least learnable section of the test. If that section is a real pain point, those practice sections could certainly help. But, I don't think its necessary to consider the entirety of the RC material in the curriculum as important as the other two areas.

I think its important to have the perspective that's not about mastering Pseudo Sufficient Assumption questions by the time you finish that section. It's just about getting some exposure and getting your eye in - getting a good intuitive idea of what those questions feels like. Even once you start focusing more on PTs, it'll be a lot of identifying weak points and revisiting content.

Good luck!

@ makes I think the most important point. Writers don't write because they want to. They because they need do. They feel a compulsion for it. I'm not saying you need to feel the same sort of impulse when it comes to the law, but frankly it needs to be pretty close. I don't mean this as a put down or a diss whatsoever. If you're genuinely not sure, if you want to yes but a part of you keeps saying no, then you might already have your answer.