For me taking the exam under time conditions is the most helpful tool to be prepared for the exam. So, it might be a lot, but I take a PT MWF, then blind review it and then Tue Thur drill anything I felt weak on the days before. I also struggle with RC as my logical games and LR range from 0-3 I have tended to emphasize RC a lot. Hope this bit of structure helps!

@ Me as well!

interested!

100% in been pting around 174-175 email is ceatherton1@.com

@ said:

@ Awesome - that's also what I was thinking. Are you taking 3 section exams, or the full 4 at one time, or...? I don't really see the advantage of taking the 5-section exam because it might stress me out more, even though I know it's supposed to "toughen" me lol. Best of luck !!!!

I just take the 3 sections, doing them so much you are going to build up the stamina for the exam anyways. Also taking the 4 sections could potentially give a misconception on your scoring since its split evenly into third rather then having LR twice!

For D) I don't believe you have to make an assumption. It concludes whenever the obstruction occurs it is reasonable to doubt if verdict is correct, and D tells us actually that there is a case when that is not case (i.e when jurors are given evidence)