Hello! I am signed up for the September test. I do not have accommodations to stand, nor do I want to stand during my test, however I have a stand up desk that has a button that will make it go in standing mode. From all of the nightmares coming from the August test I am a bit nervous my desk will get me in trouble. First world problems I know. Does anyone have an opinion of this? I contacted LSAC and Prometric but I believe with all the test drama they are busy.
For D I was in the mindset that Hampton believes technology is needed because he agrees with Kim that human population is growing at a dangerous rate.
Was stuck between D and B but picked D because of this thought
I was stuck between A and C. I picked C because I thought to myself, "Okay parents are reading the reviews however any indication of a gun makes them not want their kids to watch a show. Guns = scary" So it doesn't matter how many guns are behind a rating just an indication of a gun worries parents.
Looking for about 3-5 people to study mostly PT/LR. Pretty good at LG (usually only missing 1 or 2 questions) so I can give some pointers here and there but I am really interested in LR since its my weakest section. I am currently using 7sage, lsatlab, a private tutor, and free resources on the demon. I applied last cycle so I can give some advice about admissions and what test day looks like. I also can give advice on getting free/ cheap studying resources, fee waivers, and testing accommodations since we are here to get all the benefits bb!
I work fulltime so Sunday afternoon study sessions are best for me but willing to be flexible.
Really would like nice, motivated, encouraging people so we are all comfortable holding each other accountable on our studys and goals! :)
Is there a way to see explanations of questions in drill mode or am I just being blind? 7sage is so difficult to navigate through I feel like instead of spending time studying I am spending time trying to navigate through this thing.
#help
So without the shapes… Is the translation turn out to be
Anderson -> Good Perspective
Therefore
Anderson -> Does not take Success for Granted.
Thus leaving us with the assumption:
GP->-SG?
I am assuming we drop the success variable in the passage since it is just a chain that is explanatory.