I think the Disney arguement is the most strong arguement because based on the laid out logic, there is no room for doubt. It's an absolute truth that Mr Walt did not prostrate himself before Goofy's altar. The only other way Walt can obtain access to Genie+ is by offering ten goats' worth of propitiations. The detective arguement leans heavily on assumption, versus either/or logic. You must infer from the provided details that Mr. Fat Cat indulged because of circumstantial evidence, but there is room for doubt.

Tiger: Not every fish is suitable for consumption; after all, some fish may contain toxins that are poisonous to humans.

Disney: Members of Spotify can listen to music. Spotify allows you to listen to free music either through a paid commercial-free channel, or an advertisement supported model. Chris has a spotify account. Chris does not have advertisements therefore Chris has a paid account.

Detective: Jack's sister Jill was seen taking a nap on the couch. Jill often takes naps after eating an afternoon meal. Jill left dirty dishes in the sink and the fridge slightly ajar, so Jack's leftovers were eaten by Jill.

Hi @SofiyaBerman, to answer your question -- You already have a score (172) above the median (171). Continuing to take the LSAT when your score is already good enough will make the admissions office think that you're targeting a different school. Admissions can't send out an infinite amount of invitations, so they have to be particular about who they choose to invite. Why send an invite to someone who appears to be targeting another school? That's the logic.