- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
#help
Please HELP.
I don't know why when given the conclusion - total lending is decreasing, and with the premise = small companies, medium sized companies decreased. We have to assume large sized companies need to be decreasing. I think it can still be increasing, but the increase level is less the the decrease level combined by small and mid-sized companies. Therefore, if we negate A, we can still have the valid argument.
I'm sooooo confused, can anyone help answer my question?
#help I have a question about answer D, what if the people who wish to avoid gaining body fat are people who requires a lot of energy, like athlete.
I chose D too when I did it the second time. I thought the celebrity /movie star who having the life style if adopted (potentially by middle-class families), will cause a serious problem, so that will be contradict to the conclusion, which is not serious problem and shouldn't be taken too seriously.
I automatically pass answer A as right answer since it's always there and very rarely been chosen.
#help If we negate answer B, isn't that become some Japanese drive on the left side of the road are still inclined to buy cars with left-side steering wheels. Since there are still Japanese drivers chose to buy cars with right-side steering wheels, how does this make the argument fall apart?
I guess my general question is how negate a conditional statement, like not (A → B ) become no A → B? isn't it should be like A some not B
Please help, thanks a lot!!
I think this is the question I'll never understand, no matter how many times I reread the questions and review JY's explanation..
#help Question 9: I understand why E is right, but I chose answer A because I thought besides Europe, there is Mexico that could have Spanish- language proverbs currently used in the Mexican American communities originated. Can anyone help point out why my thought is wrong? Many thanks!!!
"How is it possible to have a third cause causing both when one of the factors (legislation) is actually missing?" very good explanation! Thank you!
I'm interested!