For this weakening question, I understand that I need to find evidence that points towards Neanderthals not being nomadic but I dont understand how the correct answer choice (Neanderthals saved gazelle teeth for use in religous rituals and later discarded them) helps prove that they are not nomadic.
Just as the title says, I was wondering if anyone has any tips in regards to noting what you would categorize as context and what you would categorize as premise. I feel like there is a blurred line from my understanding.
I've been blind reviewing and want to identify the question categories I get wrong most, and these come up often but I dont know what they entail. If someone could give me examples that would be great too.
Be able to identify the premises and conclusion for each LR question. When it comes to RRE, Weakening, Strengthening, Flaw questions, be able to identify the gap/jump between premises and conclusion.