Why is everyone saying LR was hard? I thought they were the easiest LR's I have taken.. now I'm starting to think I'm just overconfident about it.

Everyone say the test was hard so we can get a -15 curve

bump

@ said:

@ said:

LR was not too bad, but I was thrown off by an early question, I remember exactly it was #2 because I could not believe I was struggling with QUESTION 2!!!! It was related to medical residents, anyone else have thoughts on this one?

I had the same problem, and it really threw me. Was the your first LR section? It was for me I think.

For me that occured for the 25Q one.

@ said:

LR was not too bad, but I was thrown off by an early question, I remember exactly it was #2 because I could not believe I was struggling with QUESTION 2!!!! It was related to medical residents, anyone else have thoughts on this one?

Yeh I messed up on that one but I thought that was because the guy beside me was on LG and rattling the shit out of the desk messing up my focus. I came back to that one at the end and realized I got it right the first time.

I'm going to keep posting on this site excessively as support for the stress of waiting for test results. Can't wait.

@ said:

@ said:

@ said:

Anyone feel this LG was so hard? I have been consistently getting -0 or -1 on LG for the past 20 PTs but I think for the LG today I might get -3 or even worse. With that being said, I do think the LRs were a bit easier than those in pt 85 and 86.

LG was sooooooo hard, I struggled a lot.

I thought the third game with banks was kind of hard and took up a lot of time. It made me run out of time and guess on a couple questions in the last game.

I did the first two of that one then bailed it, so I would have enough for the last one. I ended up having to guess 3 or so on that one. But it was better to guess on that one than the easier last one.

@ I did the first two of that one then bailed it, so I would have enough for the last one. I ended up having to guess 3 or so on that one. But it was better to guess on that one than the easier last one.

Anyone think the LR's were easy?

I messed up on the reading comprhension because the proctor started the test so fast after the directions and then I started on question 7 because my seal got stuck to the page. She was easily 400 pounds.

This one is deep as fuck...the initial command needed to be repeated 1,000 times and was not so therefore none of the other subsequent command could have been effective.

Averaged a 161 on pt got a 155 was my first time taking. WTF

Closed until Monday. I was trying to rephrase it clearer than the first. Don't understand how no one else knows about this.

My score on 72 was my highest of all prep tests in the 70's by 3-4 points.

I only recently started using JY's explanations after 78-81, so I want to know if I improved due to his help or because it was an easier test? Thank you

Lol, I'm an Economics major. This one was easy as fuck.

This is dumb answer. West didn't have to presuppose they had an equal number of inspections. He could have known that Hayne inspected more and been ignorant of the fact that because he inspected more he would have more returns. This is simply a stupid question. Young is assuming that West is presupposing they had equal number of inspections. There is no proof that West made such presupposition.

This passage is ridiculous.

I understand why A is correct and B is incorrect. A is MUST be true while B could or could not be true. If it were the same then great, if not then you could have overlap but still have most, or even you could have less than most if you were to only use 60-60 which would produce 1-2-3-4-5-6 and 10-9-8-7-6-5. With only overlap 5-6 from each group, only those two accept wang's law and Brown's. In that case the results would be inconclusive. If the question said, more than 50 percent of those who accepted both were the same people then that would be necessary but it says 100 percent who accepted each were the same people which is not necessary because it could be anywhere from 50.00001 to 100%. Once again, typing this shit out helps me understand this.

How I read D. was that sunlight is the MOST important factor in generating heat. If it were less than most then I would say that the other factors would outweigh the effect you get from MORE sunlight being reflected back into space. But, I think D. is wrong because C. exacerbates the problem. But, again while typing this I'm figuring out why D. is wrong. Even if it were true that sunlight had only a miniscule effect on the heating of the earth. Lets say all the sun was reflected back into space and the temperature was 72 degrees and no sun was reflected into space and the temperature was 72.0001 degrees. Even if that were true, the temperature on average would still be Cooler no matter how insignificant the effect of sunlight on heating of the earth. Therefore, whether or not earth derives most or a miniscule amount of it's heat from sunlight is irrellevant. While answer C., works because it worsens the effect of having NO snow. This probably has to do with the earth and water trapping heat working as a heat sink which later warms the planet for a long period of time. But, I do not think whatsoever the LSAT test writers meant that the sunlight passing back through the earth warms it twice at all.

@ said:

@ said:

Everyone say the test was hard so we can get a -15 curve

Is there precedent for this?

I wouldn't be suprised if the makers of LSAT got online and studied the comments about the test. It happens in school and judging by how rudimentry/ghetto the testing centers were it would not suprise me if they did this instead of using actual statistics about the test to find the curve.