User Avatar
chunhuizhuang587
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT133.S3.Q11
User Avatar
chunhuizhuang587
Saturday, Sep 28 2013

I feel this Q is really like a SA question. Though the question stem is definitely a NA form, but I can get the conclusion from the logic in the correct answer choice. And I got it right by doing it as a SA.

User Avatar

Tuesday, Sep 17 2013

chunhuizhuang587

Can anyone watch videos other than LG for prep 58?

I can only open videos for LG under Prep 58. Every other opens with "html5: Video file not found". I tried both normal PC browsers and Apple browser, but none worked. Prep videos other than 58 work. Does anyone have the same problem, or know why this happened? Thanks!!

User Avatar

Thursday, Aug 08 2013

chunhuizhuang587

PT39.S4.Q23 - law of supply and demand

My problem on this Q is that I can exclude the other four wrong answer choices, but I can't find the right answer choice right either.

Here is my thought:

The premise: no free market economy -> the maximum total utility is not assured;

The conclusion: a country is not trying to bring about a free market economy -> the country is not acting in the way most likely to bring about the maximum total utility.

The right answer choice: the argument wrongly presumes that trying to bring about a condition that will assure the achievement of an end -> the way most likely to achieve that end.

However, if I put this presumption back to the argument, what is negated in the argument is the sufficient condition here ( to assure the achievement of an end is not satisfied ). This negation doesn't get to the argument's conclusion, which is the negation of the necessary condition in the answer choice ( not the way most likely to achieve that end). So I feel the right answer choice should be like "wrongly presumes that the way most likely to achieve max utility -> trying to bring about a condition that will ensure its achievement."

Could anyone give some light?

http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-39-section-4-question-23/

User Avatar
chunhuizhuang587
Wednesday, Oct 02 2013

Thanks Ping! You're a great teacher and encouragement!

PrepTests ·
PT135.S4.Q21
User Avatar
chunhuizhuang587
Wednesday, Oct 02 2013

Is there any conditionality in the sentence "that there are no similarly structured societies not subject to those factors, and no societies that, though subject to those factors, are not so structured"? Or it only states a "some" relationship? Or even merely asking for a correlation? When I was doing this Q, I tried to structure this part into sufficient/necessary condition, but I failed to figure out a sure one and then I found to answer this Q I don't have to go that much deeper with the structure.

Confirm action

Are you sure?