- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I misread AC B. I read it as "trees nearby the orchards." Darn. I chose C. But it can be eliminated by simply saying "who cares" lol.
I got this one wrong. And was pretty furious. After my grieving period I watched the explanation and came to the following conclusion as to why B is correct.
The Bible could have influenced 200 people.
1984 could have influenced 199 people.
This would leave the majority of the surveyed population to pick at most 601 other books! That would mean that 1984 does not have a large influence over the readers of the newspaper. Therefore, AC B in more detrimental to the argument than AC C. Which I chose originally.
Tough one for sure.
Watsup Team! I hope everyone is doing well.
I took the LSAT 2 years ago and did not get the score I wanted. I ended up not retaking but continued on with my commercial real estate job.
Fast forward to today, I just began studying again. I have decided to take the new form of the LSAT (sans LG) in Aug of this year in order to apply to early decisions by November. I would like to pursue my dream of becoming a deal attorney here in the Mountain West.
For the next 9 months I will be solely studying LR and RC. My reasoning behind this is that 2 subjects are easier to study for than 3. Plus I was never great at LG lol. In fact, I hate LG. However, I (oddly enough) enjoy LR.
If anyone wants to start a study group to focus on the newest format of the LSAT, I am available.
Bon Chance!
AC B did not say they used telephones. It states they used "other devices". This eliminates the possibility of "other devices" causing a rash. Because if the devices did cause a rash, the people would be experiencing rashes on both sides of their faces. That being said, I got this one wrong too.