- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
This would be great. I think its important to understand theory over specific question types. At the end of the day, question stems are just superficial. Analyzing arguments is key
I think the best way to look at this question is by remembering a crucial LSAT Fallacy. KNOWLEDGE/ BELIEF ≠ FACT. The first thing that jumped out to me was that the Reader Believed something to be true. "Okay, but who is this reader?" "Many people hold crazy beliefs that are not true." The author then uses this to prove that the Authors intended meaning of the poem is wrong because great poems don't have contradictory meanings.
The first thing I realized was, " Okay, but just because some random person thinks a poem has a contradictory meaning, doesn't necessarily mean the poem actually has this meaning."Someone could think whatever they want about a poem but it won't change the actual meaning". The argument is flawed. The assumption we need is one that would complete the argument. AC (E) clearly does this. It makes the Readers belief an actual part of the poem.
Hello, @ If someone doesn't come through with the venmo, can I have #10? If not, can you explain how I could create a similar binder?
@ I think it would be extremely beneficial to post the videos of these workshops after. It would allow all students a change to experience the workshop without having to rely on the luck of a lottery, while still maintaining a benefit for those who won the lottery. Since the lottery winners will still have the privilege of an interactive experience and personalized questions.