Hi guys,
This is such a stupid question but as the title says, how do you translate: "Jack must wear every colour Fred wears" into Lawgic
Is it F-->J ?
My confusion stems from the fact that there are 2 lawgic indicators (must and every) here. I actually missed "every" initially and thought it was only must so I diagrammed it as J-->F.
Should I interpret it as: "Every colour Fred wears must be worn by Jack" ?
Sorry for the silly question haha just want to be sure.
@ said:
This is a helpful discussion on this topic:
https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/19951
Thank you @ - really helpful and I will bookmark it!
I just want to make sure my reasoning is correct: is D not required because even though "The door is the only way in and out of the house..." is required "...and the lock is impenetrable" is too strong- is the reason it's too strong is because even if it is penetrable there could be other security features in the door besides the lock that will prevent potential robbers from breaking in?