User Avatar
cnavarro495649
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Hi guys,

This is such a stupid question but as the title says, how do you translate: "Jack must wear every colour Fred wears" into Lawgic

Is it F-->J ?

My confusion stems from the fact that there are 2 lawgic indicators (must and every) here. I actually missed "every" initially and thought it was only must so I diagrammed it as J-->F.

Should I interpret it as: "Every colour Fred wears must be worn by Jack" ?

Sorry for the silly question haha just want to be sure.

User Avatar
cnavarro495649
Sunday, Jul 28 2019

@ said:

This is a helpful discussion on this topic:

https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/19951

Thank you @ - really helpful and I will bookmark it!

I just want to make sure my reasoning is correct: is D not required because even though "The door is the only way in and out of the house..." is required "...and the lock is impenetrable" is too strong- is the reason it's too strong is because even if it is penetrable there could be other security features in the door besides the lock that will prevent potential robbers from breaking in?

User Avatar

Saturday, Jul 27 2019

cnavarro495649

Necessary assumption

Hi,

I have this argument: "Because we locked the door, no one can break into our house."

The book says that this is not a necessary assumption: "The door is the only way in and out of the house, and the lock impenetrable."

But I thought that if the door is not the only way in/out and the lock is penetrable then you can't really say that if you lock the door no one can break into your house.

Can someone please explain to me why that assumption is not necessary?

Thank you!

PrepTests ·
PT141.S4.Q3
User Avatar
cnavarro495649
Monday, Sep 23 2019

Is it also safe to say that "fails to distinguish" is not the same as "overlooks"? If the AC said "overlooks the possibility that the sunscreen lowers the severity of those cases...", would that be a correct AC?

#help

admin. note: added #help

User Avatar
cnavarro495649
Thursday, Mar 09 2017

Just wondering how well-designed the empirical study was- it said that "... science, technology, engineering and math backgrounds. For these students, international students, multidisciplinary scholars, and joint-degree students, the GRE is a familiar and accessible test"

There could be endogeneity issue and the GRE is not necessarily the predictor of first-year success... Just my two cents :p

Confirm action

Are you sure?