Hi @ , is it possible for you to upload a PDF copy of this file?

I don't understand why in option D: "must have discovered" is equated to mean has discovered for sure. Can't it also mean that he must have discovered it, but may not have?

Also, is there a crucial difference between the words "must" and "might"? Seems like there is. And is this difference a hard rule or is merely played out by their use these sentences?

Thanks @

Hi @.lee

So we know that in the game there are 2 of each F, G and L. So let's name the game pieces F1, F2, G1, G2, L1 and L2.

Now the rule reads: Frank demonstrates exactly one task before Gladys demonstrates any of the tasks.

This means that before G demonstrates the first task i.e. G1, there is exactly 1 F and no more.

Thus F1 - G1.

Now we must also remember that F2 cannot be before G1, because the rule says exactly 1 F is before any of the Gs i.e. before the 1st G (G1). And so F2 has to be after G1.

i.e. G1 - F2

if we link it up: F1 - G1 - F2

Now what about G2?

Well G2 can be anywhere as long as it is after G1.

So your final chain can look like either:

1) F1 - G1 - G2 - F2; OR

2) F1 - G1 - F2 - G2

I think your biggest confusion was how to interpret: before ANY

This means before the FIRST

as opposed to before both or before either or before all which would imply that F1 is before and F2 is after both G1 and G2 i.e. F1 - G1 - G2 - F2.

@ @ @ , thanks guys.

@ @ in fact, then question bank is what attracts me to upgrade the most. Tell me something, how does this work? Can you just type, for eg. MSS and get all most strongly supported questions ever?

Hi @ . Initially LG was my weakest section too. But now I get 0-2 incorrect. Just hang in there and practice. At first practice them un-timed, then re-practice the test if you get anything wrong. Most games are similar. Once you get the hang of it, you'll be able to go through the games really fast. Best of luck!

So I have a book of all the LR questions I get wrong. I don't know if that's called a journal. It will be great if one of you can elaborate a little more on how to maintain a journal and what to add in it.

I am from India and competing of sorts. I don't know if that counts.

I have ADHD, not taken accommodation. With practice, I have managed to improve scores a decent bit and manage timing. I do make silly errors by misreading stuff and I still face timing problems with RC, working on it :p . Again this all depends on the severity of your ADHD.

It comes directly from Dr. Anders' statement "You and I know that both methods are capable of providing the same information"

Isn't the major conclusion: "must obviously plagiarised superior ones"?

If so, then the argument does not presuppose what it seeks to establish.

I am finding it difficult to understand why the first sentence is being considered as the major conclusion, in my mind it is merely a sub-conclusion and the major premise to establishing that Cotrell must have plagiarised superior articles.

The Manhattan book for RC is good, but I'd recommend the LSAT trainer.

This question should not be in the MSS Problem Set but in the Main Point.

Don't actors have scripts? And hamlet is a script in itself. So an actor who played a role in Hamlet should necessarily have had a copy of Hamlet (the script).

Option D says a spectator; isn't it equally plausible that a spectator remembers the lines of one character extremely well and not those of other characters. For eg. some one watching game of thrones may know the lines of Tyrion Lannister verbatim but may not be able to narrate the exact sequence of events in the show.

So the article on the HLS website states: "The ABA is currently reviewing possible changes to rules governing which tests law schools may use in making admissions decisions."

Will the ABA's decision affect this pilot project? Also any idea as to which way the wind is blowing? Is the ABA looking to make the LSAT non-mandatory?

In answer A. The requirement of shrimp or oyster hosts (SOH) is a necessary condition to the existence of parasites (P).

i.e. P→SOH .

Now we are asked why the lack of P i.e. /P indicates stress.

But if answer A were to be believed P→SOH this does not tell us anything about /P

How do we infer /P→/SOH (I know it is not technically /SOH, but SOH in stress, how do we still infer that?)

@ said:

@ said:

Hi @ , is it possible for you to upload a PDF copy of this file?

PDFs have been banned by LSAC since April 2014.

Oh right! No problem. Thanks :smile:

Thanks @

@ @ @ @ Thanks guys, much appreciated.

Hi @, thanks! Also how long did it take you to go from 4:45 to under 3:30?

@.rizeq thanks. Will check it out

@ well LR I get around 1-3 wrong per section. In RC somedays I manage to get all correct in blind review, but on most days not a lot. Improving on RC can be the real game changer for me.

Thanks. I feel so stupid now! Never get games wrong. Guess I was too stressed while doing it :p .