The issue I'm trying to figure out is the relationship between "spellcasters" and "wizards". Like sure, I can assume that spellcasters are wizards since the modifying quality of "can't/can cast ninth-level", but is that formal? Without external knowledge of wizards being the same as spellcasters (fireball, clash royale, etc.). The raptor/velociraptor is a lexical relationship, it's literally in the text, but I think it's less clear with wizards/spellcasters, even with the modifiers.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Sorry, you need a subscription for that.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
The issue I'm trying to figure out is the relationship between "spellcasters" and "wizards". Like sure, I can assume that spellcasters are wizards since the modifying quality of "can't/can cast ninth-level", but is that formal? Without external knowledge of wizards being the same as spellcasters (fireball, clash royale, etc.). The raptor/velociraptor is a lexical relationship, it's literally in the text, but I think it's less clear with wizards/spellcasters, even with the modifiers.