Just a general question about NA question. What clues/cues do some of you have to help you determine from the get go if you need to bridge or find a shield answer? I notice I usually freak out in some of these situations. Any insight i deeply appreciated.
Anyone have a good list of terms that indication correlation? I have a hard time distinguishing what’s causal and what’s correlated.
Is there a better way to possibly explain Answer choice A? Not fully understanding it.
Cant you just look at this like a correlation to causation flaw? "seemed to contribute" in my eyes would be another way to state a correlation. The conclusion is causal: Local media was cause and effect was the museum staying open.
Way to weaken causal conclusion is to show No Cause (no local media coverage) and same effect (museum is open) and that's what D shows. This makes more sense to me.
YOOOO! I just wanted to ask a quick question about the must be true test for Necessary Assumption answer choices? could someone elaborate on that? Im confused with it. Specifically for the Rattlesnake question JY gives us in the lesson. The AC has to do with food which was never even mentioned in the premises/conclusion. How do we determine whether foreign information is relevant to the argument?
anyone that could diagram this would be of extreme help. I got :
If dont pay --> beyond control or recorded on the preexisting damage list.
I know Jy talks about it as a biconditional, but i would like to know how reliable my approach is.