This text comes up whenever I hover over a recent post but it does not include any time limit.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
recent post == when I write a reply. I am not sure what happens when I post a comment that is not a reply.
Sounds like a pretty good deal to me.
Don't eat a big lunch, it will make you sleepy.
If you exercise try to do a bit longer of an exercise. I run, I can normally get some pretty good endorphins from a 6-8 mile run.
I wouldn't worry much about a PT. Maybe drill some simple sequencing games just to get you in the zone.
Relax and go into the test knowing that you are going to have a good time.
Computer Science major here. No. I have not come across a problem yet where math is an important skill. If you know what numbers are bigger than others you should be fine. Just make sure that you are familiar with major terms, like what an average is.
So far I have realized that the LSAT does not rely on a lot of external knowledge. They make the test like that on purpose.
How strictly should we adhere to this graph? I have no clue where I would fall on this graph if I did outstandingly well on the LSAT. Is GPA a good indicator on who gets selected? Who would Harvard accept, a computer science major with a 3.2 and a 176 or a psychology major with a 3.9 and a 171? Assuming rolling admission and we are down to the last spot.
Thank you for posting a link. I will look into it. Anyone who has spent a significant amount of time studying logic do you have an opinion toward taking a course on it? Would it be better to just cover as many LSAT logic books as possible or to take a course on logic?
You trolling? Could find no such course and Stanford is not even a school of edx. I know Stanford has many courses with coursera. Here is the closest thing to the course you mentioned that I could find.
https://www.coursera.org/course/intrologic
Starts in 9 days and could be beneficial, I know my CS class in logic was a little bit beneficial just because I could always prove things out and solidify my reasoning. That is not really LSAT logic though. JY covers logic very specific to the LSAT and he covers it very well. Taking this course could just end in a waste of time.
Post a link next time.
http://classic.7sage.com/lesson/neither-nor/
Neither nor - Not one and not the other.
So X is not Y AND not Z
Nvm. Something broken on my end. Tried to play some local videos and they were not working either. Restarted my machine and is all fixed now.
None of my videos are working right now. They buffer but they do not play anything. Tried disabling flash. I tried two browsers. Firefox and Chrome.
Have you used other sources than just 7sage to learn logic games? My advice would be to go out and buy a manhattan or powerscore book on logic games. Gain another perspective.
For me RC was/still kind of is a killer but I am doing much better after switching from the 7sage method to the powerscore method. Not saying 7sage's method was bad, it just was not right for me. If looking at another source does not help it will at least reinforce some ideas that 7sage taught you.
I blind review every question in 7Sage, so everything takes me so long. One thing that I am noticing is that with RC, I do not do terribly when doing the blind review. I mostly just do bad when I have the 35 min time limit. I will read more and a lot more of what everyone mentioned above. But does anyone have tips on speeding up reading?
Edit: I also just stumbled upon this quick lecture: http://classic.7sage.com/lesson/the-memory-method-for-improving-lsat-reading-comprehension/
Hopefully the lecture helps and I will try it with the sources above too.
Thank you for all the sources to look into. RC is by far my worst section.
Hey cole.w.murdoch do you have any philosophy journals you would recommend to start with?
Works for me now Alan. Thank you for the fast fix.