Can you guys do one for Canada too? Where's the love? :)

Would have had a much better chance of getting this question right if I hadn't identified the wrong conclusion. Glad to hear this won't be a problem in future LSATs.

I'm sure professional lawyers at big firms dealing with high stress situations are careful to use words such as "shoot" and "darn".

It could be in any ordering.

I'm not sure I'm clueing in on why A isn't a good answer choice.

A general theory of the arts explains every aesthetic feature of any art form.

So if a general theory of art explains painting, it must also explain sculpture.

Is my issue that I'm assuming painting and sculpture are art forms? Doesn't seem like a huge or unreasonable assumption to make at all.

They will let you know.

I'm glad to see this passage angered someone as much as it angered me.

Right off the bat we know A cannot be true. A says either the economy is weak or investment is decreasing.

We know FOR A FACT that investment is not decreasing. It says so right in the statement.

Therefore, the economy MUST be weak, according to A. But guess what, if investment is not decreasing, than the economy can't be weak.

There's no need to overthink or complicate. Even how JY reasons it in the video I think is too much, it's an extra step. The key is that last sentence in the question that says "Fortunately, investment is not decreasing." That is a gift.

You don't have to read the other options, that's it.