User Avatar
daishitanaka97828
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar

Sunday, May 05 2024

daishitanaka97828

Don't Give Up (145 > 170 in three years)

Hi 7Sagers-- I'm sharing my story in case it helps with others gritting their teeth to push past plateaus, crushed by the weight of their own expectations. Since I was a kid, it has always been my dream to become an attorney. But I paused that dream after college in order to enter the workforce and financially provide for my family. Like many of you, this test terrified me. I took my diagnostic and scored a 145. But deep down, I knew I wanted a 170. I read many online forums that claimed that such a score jump is impossible.

I worked long hours with multiple jobs and I barely had time to sleep. The routine of working full time, studying at night, and maintaining my mental and physical health was a Herculean effort. I took two different courses, eventually landing on the holy grail of 7Sage. But my PT scores were erratic, often plummeting down along with my confidence and self-worth. I scoffed at stories of people suggesting that 3-6 months of studying was enough. Two years have passed for me and I only increased 10-15 points.

With the help of 7Sage tutors, I scored a 166. I jumped up and down in joy. But every time I hit the ground, I felt in my stomach that I wasn't done. I felt as if I didn't reach my goal of 170, I won't be able to face my other ambitious, nearly-impossible career goals. I must defeat this last boss monster in front of me. I must push this Sisyphean boulder past this mountain slope, no matter how many times I fall.

I was tired. I hated this test. I made a hard decision to defer law school for another year even though I was nearly five years past undergrad. But I took a four month break from the test. Refreshed, I began studying for several more months. This April, I finally got the 170. Three years of infinite drilling, crying at the desk, saying 'no' to friends, all paid off.

Please don't give up. Take a break. Come back. Don't rush the process.

You are Sisyphus. Except in this story, the boulder will fall over the mountain.

45
PrepTests ·
PT119.S4.Q15
User Avatar
daishitanaka97828
Wednesday, Jan 25 2023

#help the video does not play

1
PrepTests ·
PT102.S4.Q26
User Avatar
daishitanaka97828
Wednesday, Nov 02 2022

This question should be removed from the MBF Problem Set. It's jarring when we're supposed to be reinforcing a certain skill set (inferences and validity) and get a question wrong because it's testing another skill (mss).

10

Hi there-- I'm ramping up my studying for the January 2022 test and I'm hoping to create a small group for consistent studying at the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library. The library's open hours are below. I'm aiming for post-work evenings on the weekdays and all day on the weekends. Please PM me if you'd like to join and I'll include you on a Signal group to coordinate. Thanks! :)

Monday:10:00 a.m.-8:00 p.m.

Tuesday:10:00 a.m.-8:00 p.m.

Wednesday:10:00 a.m.-8:00 p.m.

Thursday:10:00 a.m.-8:00 p.m.

Friday:10:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m.

Saturday:10:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m

Sunday:1:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m.

1
PrepTests ·
PT23.S2.Q14
User Avatar
daishitanaka97828
Friday, Sep 23 2022

D is saying that statistical information about life expectancy was not available. This is similar to Lee's argument to the effect of arguing life expectancy could not have affected people's attitudes since they didn't have any concept of it; Kim's casual argument that life expectancy changed attitudes can't be true.

A is different that it is saying there was a different way life expectancy caused attitude change. Even if Lee's argument is correct, there is an alternative explanation (economic changes) that connected changes in life expectancy to changes in attitudes.

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?