#help

Not only did I get RC# 13 incorrect, I did so confidently (lol) and both on blind review AND this video review I was unable to arrive at the correct conclusion. Even now, I'm unsure that I'd be able to deduce this quickly on a test. When I get to the RC section and begin doing drills, how can I study for this type of question? Are all Art, InfAP and Co questions similar?

Thank you for this explanation!

I need to work on EXCEPT questions. lol

@ so you'd recommend say, getting to the core curriculum problem set doing x amount and then waiting to do a blind review (i.e. opening different tabs for each problem set and treating it similar to a PT?)

@-2 agreed on the practice sets but when you are doing drills or problem sets in the core curriculum is it also recommended to take an hr/next day break or it it wiser to follow up immediately?

I somehow read this as a strengthening question like a moron lol. Soot -> /Ailment. I read it as Soot -> Ailment and chose B. Well at least I understood how to answer this problem if I read it correctly haha.

I had a feeling A was correct but I still went with B. I assumed that perhaps there could be comorbid disease to which X could be harmful towards, so if you had disease A and B, and treatment X is beneficial to A but harmful to B, where as Y is beneficial to both then you would chose Y. I understand why A is correct but what if I don't grant that animals are important when it comes to being tested on, if it benefits humans? Why is a value judgment about animals that aren't in the stimulus a better weakening objection than the possibility of comorbidity (which is also not in the stimulus) how do you determine which assumption is warranted?

#help