Awesome! what timezone are you guys in? in PDT. I was thinking maybe we could a zoom meeting this week to discuss questions, concepts, general stuff. How does that sound.
Hey friends,
I took the August Flex and know I can do a couple points better on October. If anyone is in the same boat or just looking for people to LSAT vent with (much needed), feel free to DM me or reply here so we can get a little group going! Cheers.
Anyone wanna look at each other's personal statements and give some feedback? DM me if interested.
Did anyone else just get completely wrecked by this entire LR section? Typically I get 20-22 correct per section, but this section I got 15...
Send to JD, as LLM is for the Master of Law degree.
I am interested. Started close to you: 136 diag, highest pt 164. Taking the test september 2.
Foucault and Derrida are great for understanding the complex literary terms they use in RC, but you wanna go for more narrative based authors of different cultural heritage to get a better understanding of the literary traditions that RC likes to explore.
Upon watching this I realized how easily this question could be a flaw Q, and it seems like thinking about it through that lens could be really useful here. That is, if we look at it as a cookie-cutter flaw – presumes, without providing justification that X is the ONLY thing that causes Y – then we know to reverse that assumption to take away the support of the argument. However, it is sometimes very tricky for me to know which subtle assumptions are reasonable, or, as the LSAT puts, superfluous. Best of luck my friends!
Got meta-wrecked on this Q. Thanks, LSAC.