So this is my problem. If I give myself ten extra minutes for each LG section I do, I will get 100% right. Every time. But the issue is time. Often times, I find myself struggling over a problem because there is ONE RULE that I haven't seen the full implications of. When I finally see it, I say to myself, "Oh...duh!" and wonder why I didn't see it in the first place. After about three months of studying, I went from a 161 to a 173, but I haven't practiced LG nearly as much as I have RC and LR. If I can shore up my LG, then I'll be set. Can anyone help me out? Is my problem simply due to a lack of practice? Thanks.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Thanks for the replies. I learned notations from the Powerscore LG Bible, but I don't stick to them 100% -- just enough for me to get the diagram down. That's really my only resource so far, plus getting a sense of how JY Ping does it from YouTube.
Could it be the old LSATs? I'm doing PTs 7-28 right now and they seem different from the new ones. Like, I JUST solved a problem, but it took me so long to finish because I didn't see a connection between two rules (connections that are WAY less obvious than simple conditional linking, etc.). This was PT 21, Game 1.
Okay thanks doode
Okay, and where else could I look for PTs? I'm getting all the Actuals and SuperPreps. Are there any less-popular sources for PrepTests, not counting the insanely expensive discontinued ones? Someone mentioned tests proctored in India??
Hey Dillon. Thanks for your answer. So it usually takes a bit for them to release the Actual bundles after they have 10 tests they can pool? I was just hoping to get the 10 most recent tests for cheap when LSAC bundles them into a new 10 Actual packet, and after next February's test, they should have 10.
I'm taking the test next June. The last 10 Actual packet ended at PT 71. This means that the next packet will be 72-81, with PT 81 being the February 2016 test. Will LSAC release 72-81 in a new 10 Actual packet before June 2016? Thanks.
@ @ @