User Avatar
dantlee14842
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Wednesday, Feb 14 2018

@catgonzalez1974737 said:

@napiersh959 said:

I did not like Georgetown's law campus much at all either. Although it is just minutes walk from the capitol, it is completely separate from the main campus and small. It's surrounded by business buildings so it feels very industrial and cold. Living near the campus would be ridiculously expensive, so commuting is a must unless you can live on campus (FYI they don't allow married couples to live on campus unless both are attending law school).

I was also disappointed at first that Georgetown Law Center was not at the iconic main campus overlooking the Potomac River. But once I visited GLC, I realized its location as a separate law campus is much better situated for what law students need: walking distance from the seats of power (whereas the main campus is isolated by DC standards, way too far from Capitol Hill). As for size, I thought it was huge for just a law school-- none of the facilities are shared with any other student body. It has its own fitness center and pool, just for law students! I think the architecture is regal and inspiring, not industrial nor cold. (note: I have no other T14 schools to compare it to.) So much is subjective!

Georgetown housing: there are lots of pockets of (relatively) affordable housing near the DC metro. Of course if it's "student housing" you're after, the university is likely to steer you toward top of the line luxury apartments aimed at "rich Georgetown" students. That said, I can see how it would appear there are no affordable choices to a newcomer, especially if the school doesn't help with that angle. DC is still exploding with gentrification. So you may have to expand your viewing area beyond Capitol Hill to find a decently priced apartment-- and yes, that means commuting, but I highly suggest not commuting by car if you can avoid it. So live near transit.

It's very possible to live in Capitol Hill affordably. I lived in DC until last week, in a beautiful corner row house two blocks from Union Station, and only paid $755/month. Before that, I lived in a crappier row house in Bloomingdale (near Shaw, and a 10 minute bike ride straight down to capitol hill) for $825/month. You just have to be willing to do a lot of searching and visiting on craigslist. The good thing about DC is that it's very geographically small, and you can bike from one end of the city to the other in 30 minutes max.

If you want a 1BR apartment (which only makes sense if you're married/moving in with a partner), then yeah, that's going to be rather expensive (1600+) no matter where you look. But if you are married/with a partner and splitting the costs, you can find options that would come out to around $800-900 per person in Capitol Hill.

1
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Tuesday, Jan 09 2018

Fpr 2, the answer is almost always yes. As for the other parts of your post, I was similarly torn between a JD vs MPP vs joint degree for a long time. But for many of the reasons Alex listed, unless there is something specific that you want to do after school that an MBA/MPP/whatever would significantly add to your toolkit and ability to succeed in that job, then no, it's almost never worth it.

0

Backstory: I took multivariable calculus as a junior in high school (yeah I know, I was pretty far ahead), and skipped any math my senior year of high school to do a legal internship instead. By the time I took linear algebra my freshman year of college, it had been well over a year and a half since I had done any math, and even though linear is considered the "easy one" (at least compared to real analysis), it was by far my worst grade in college (a C+), although my grades across the board my freshman fall were pretty mediocre. It also made me remember that I absolutely hated math, and I never took another math course again. Is this something worth writing an addendum for, even though it's just one grade as opposed to say, a personal tragedy that seriously affects somebody's grades across the board for a semester?

0
User Avatar

Tuesday, Nov 14 2017

dantlee14842

How to format short answer responses?

Hi everyone, so I'm about to send in my first application today (gulp), and I was wondering how people have formatted their short answer responses? This school has multiple possible prompts, so should I copy paste the question I'm answering at the top of my word doc/PDF, or should I just assume it'll be obvious which prompt I'm writing about and just upload the clean text? The short answer questions are fairly distinct.

0
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Thursday, Nov 09 2017

I haven't looked into any of the financial aid stuff (need to actually apply first), but I'm in a very similar situation with my parents so I'd be interested if any prior applicants or people that have already applied this cycle have more info.

0
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Tuesday, Nov 07 2017

At this point, I think it's better to apply within the next few weeks instead of waiting until January. You don't really know that you'll do better in December, even with intense preparation - at that end of the curve, just a few mistakes can make all the difference. And you'd have to score a 175+ for it to be worth the two month delay.

With a 3.5 and a 172, that will get you into probably almost all of the bottom half of the T14, with a solid shot at all non-HYS schools. Even with a 175, you still wouldn't have a great chance at HYS, and it wouldn't significantly change your chances at the rest of the T-14.

4
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Tuesday, Nov 07 2017

Hm, foolproofing LG alone was probably 100+ hours. 20 full PTs is another 90 hours just taking them, and then the time spent actually blind reviewing... I'd guess I spent at least 300 hours total spread out over 9ish months? Ended up with a 174 FWIW.

1
User Avatar

Tuesday, Nov 07 2017

dantlee14842

Crazy to hyperlink in PS?

I wrote one of my PS about an experience that really solidified my interest in becoming a lawyer; spending a summer doing an independent research project in Arizona on US-Mexico border policy. One particularly memorable event, which I write about at length, was in an Operation Streamline proceeding - to learn a bit more about the program you can read this NYT piece on it from a few years back, but it's a really dehumanizing proceeding with pretty appalling due process issues.

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/12/us/split-second-justice-as-us-cracks-down-on-border-crossers.html

Anyway, while I go in depth about the proceeding in the PS, I decided to cut all the exposition explaining what exactly Operation Streamline's purpose and history is for length. Is it a crazy idea to hyperlink to that article on my first mention of Streamline, or should I just assume admissions readers will look it up if they're not already familiar with the program?

0
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Tuesday, Nov 07 2017

Would also love to do a PS/Diversity Statement swap with some people this week. Send me a DM if you're down.

0
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Sunday, Nov 05 2017

I rarely eliminated all 4 ACs in any section unless I was really struggling between two choices. In LR especially, I made a big jump when I was able to more confidently and quickly choose an answer choice on that "gut instinct" you described.

2

I've gathered that unless there are extremely extenuating circumstances, it's better not to write an actual addendum for a change in GPA or a particularly bad semester. My question: will a significantly upward GPA trend, or high GPA within-majors, automatically be noticed/sifted out by admissions committees when they look at my transcript, or is it worth noting that in a line on the resume (I'd just put something like GPA last two years: 3.8; in-major GPA: 3.85 on the same line as my undergraduate education) or somewhere similarly small?

0
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Monday, Sep 25 2017

@cbyrns21189 said:

What schools offer an in-person interview? I didn't think that was common anymore.

Among the top-15, UVA requires an interview of every admitted student. I tried to compile a list (got definitive answers on most of the schools) a few months ago here: https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/12009/which-t-14-schools-have-interviews

1
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Monday, Sep 25 2017

I wouldn't worry about it too much, I was in the same boat and reconnected with my main academic recommender (my second recommendation will be my current employer) when I visited my alma mater in May; after chatting for 30 minutes over coffee, he actually offered to write a rec unprompted. If you're going to homecoming or some kind of alumni event, that's a great time to reach out to profs and catch up - and then you can ask them for a rec either in person or in an e-mail afterward. If it's just not feasible for you to get back to campus, then a cold e-mail is fine - just include an updated resume and comment on certain things you'd like them to highlight.

0
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Monday, Sep 25 2017

154 diagnostic, 166 on my first take in December, 174 on my second take in June. 7sage was critical in getting me above the 170 mark; I'd used powerscore until around November 2016. Huge improvements are absolutely possible with dedicated study.

1
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Thursday, Aug 10 2017

Maybe this is just me, but I didn't think it was a particularly challenging RC. Got -2 on the section on test day, which is about what I expected. But honestly, I think I just got lucky that there was no art passage (hallelujah), since I consistently found those the most challenging and time-consuming (having less than zero prior knowledge lol).

0
User Avatar

Wednesday, Jul 26 2017

dantlee14842

Which T-14 Schools Have Interviews?

I've been searching for hours but haven't been able to find a useful or remotely comprehensive list. It seems like Northwestern and Georgetown do in-person interviews, and Harvard, Columbia, and UChicago do videoconference interviews. Does anyone else know about the other schools? I mainly ask because I'm debating whether I should even apply to the schools that require in-person interviews, as I will be out of the country next winter/spring and wouldn't be able to fly back without the school actually subsidizing my travel.

Thanks in advance for any useful info!

EDIT: Probably easier to organize by school and update as we get info.

Harvard: Video interview

Yale: No interview

Stanford: No interview

Columbia: Video interview

Chicago: Video interview

Penn: ?? (their website says their admissions committee occasionally asks to interview candidates, but it seems uncommon)

NYU: No interview

Berkeley: No interview

Michigan: No interview

Virginia: Interview (phone? video? in-person?)

Northwestern: In-person interview

Georgetown: In-person group interview

Duke: ??

Cornell: ??

1
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Wednesday, Jul 26 2017

@19398 said:

Have you thought about what it would actually be like to be a teacher? Teach for America is definitely not something to do off the cuff, if you haven't seriously considered what you would be signing up for. If you haven't worked with kids, or this population, or aren't sure if you would enjoy teaching, I would recommend starting by doing something smaller, but involving the population you reference. You could volunteer at a Boys and Girls club or something similar to get a feel for if it is for you. My main point is that I don't think it's a good idea to do TFA just for an application booster, because it is a huge challenge and something to definitely be sure of. Just my two cents!

Yeah, this is actually super important. A lot of my friends had awful TFA experiences after college, and they were really committed to teaching and helping underserved communities going in.

0
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Wednesday, Jul 26 2017

At the very least, it'll get you fee waivers at almost all the T-14 schools - so that could easily save you thousands of dollars come application time. There are also TFA/Americorps/Peacecorps/Military service specific scholarships that you'd be eligible for at many of the T-14.

0
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Tuesday, Jul 25 2017

My center didn't have a clock in the room (and the proctor accidentally called an LR section 10 mins early lol) but I did have a very graphic depiction of Jesus' crucifixion directly to my left. I was unsure if that was a good or bad omen at the time (ended up being a good one).

2
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Tuesday, Jul 18 2017

@wraith985-4026 said:

How can you tell what's important and what's not in an argument without reading and understanding the whole thing first?

map h4x that's how

0
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Tuesday, Jul 18 2017

I'm in the camp that believes taking 5 section-PTs is not necessary. I took the LSAT twice, and neither time did I feel that stamina/endurance or focus at the end of the test were issues. You'll be wired and full of nervous energy for the full 4-5 hours on test day. Doing 5 sections once or twice to get the feel could be useful, but I think it overcomplicates things and makes it tougher to score your own PTs.

0
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Tuesday, Jul 18 2017

@jkatz1488955 said:

Hi all :)

In my timed PTs, I always tank the first LR section... a VERY poor performance. I think this can be attributed to my brain not being warmed up? As a solution, would it make sense to take a timed LR section prior to the PT?

If yes, a concern I have in implementing this into my routine is- test day. On test day, do I take a timed PT at home before driving to the test center? Do I do it in my car at the test center? Would taking it in my car freak me out too much right before the test? I do not want to finalize something into my routine and then derail it on test day, possibly negatively impacting my performance.

I could take a timed LR section maybe an hour before the PT and then maybe a LG or 2 right before?

Anyways, I would love to hear what you guys think. Thank you in advance! :)

I didn't do this when studying, but I did do exactly one logic game and around 5 LR questions before leaving my house for the center on test day. But I'm not sure how much it really helped, because there's just SO MUCH time wasted at the test center, and all the questions I got wrong were in the first two sections of the test for me anyway.

If it's a consistent issue for you, I would advise possibly bringing a flash card with some LR questions printed out on it, and read through those while you're waiting in the registration line - and then toss it out before entering the test room (there shouldn't be any issue if you just make sure to throw it away before they check your ziploc bag).

0
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Tuesday, Jul 18 2017

I always read the full stimulus, underline/bracket the main conclusion (I write the letter "C" next to it), then go into the answer choices. Make sure you read every answer choice, too. Way too many trap answers are placed right before the real answer to risk skipping answer choices, even when you're 99% confident.

1
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Tuesday, Jul 11 2017

@twssmith644 said:

So excited about your future!! Whenever I saw your name or heard your voice, I knew to pay serious attention to learn from you & my instincts were right on. You worked your tail off and it was exciting to be a part of your journey!

Appreciate our time together and hope you will let me know what happens during the admission cycle...

All the Best:)

Tyler

Thank you so much Tyler!! I'll definitely be in touch throughout the rest of the process. I know you're going to kill it in September, you're so close to freedom! :smiley: (3(/p)

P.S. And thank you to everyone who has reached out on this thread or individually! I really appreciate it.

0
User Avatar
dantlee14842
Tuesday, Jul 11 2017

@6400 said:

What's your modified version of the foolproof method? Please share @dantlee14842

Hey Surfy, sure thing - below is what I wrote to a few people who asked.

Thanks a ton! I'd be happy to share. It's not that different from the foolproof method tbh, but I drastically reduce the amount of takes and change the timing up.

I printed out 3 copies of every LG from PT 1-50 (once I got into the 50s, I started intentionally choosing LG sections that were rated as "Hard" on 7sage or had miscellaneous games). Then I just started going in order with 1 clean 35-minute take for each PT'S LG section. I marked approximate times at the top of each game, and if I ran out of time at the end, I'd note that, start the stopwatch, and finish the game - then mark down the extra time I needed.

After that, I'd score the entire section (without BR, because I don't think it's super helpful for LG), and if I got worse than -2 or -3 overall, I'd watch JY's explanation videos for the problem games and highlight them in my excel sheet (I used the Cambridge LSAT Logic Games tracker, which you can download for free on their website) for a retake 4 days later (I didn't always stick to 4 days exactly, but I wanted to give it enough time that I wouldn't just be able to reproduce the inferences from memory - I know that's the 7Sage method, but it's always seemed really dumb to me, and an easy way to unintentionally avoid mastery of concepts). If on my second take, I still was getting -3 or worse, I would highlight that entire PT in bright red in my spreadsheet.

I started my foolproofing about 3 months before the test, so I made sure that I was doing and reviewing at least one full set of LG every day (as in, one PT's worth of LG). I tried to save re-takes for weekends so I wouldn't be too exhausted after work every day, but I didn't exactly stick to a perfectly spaced schedule (like if I had a date or wanted to get a drink or whatever, I'd just skip that day and literally double down the following day).

By the time I got to the 50s, I was consistently getting -2 or better on even the hard sections, and well within the time limit, which used to be my main issue on LG. I then started hunting for miscellaneous games and "Hard/Harder/Hardest" rated LG sections, since that was what had thrown me off so badly in the December test. After the June test, I almost wished I hadn't spent so much time on miscellaneous games, because there ended up being none on my exam, but it obviously worked out alright!

In any case, if you stick to a pretty tight schedule, and put in at least 1-2 hours every day on LG, you can definitely get down to a -1 or -0 by September.

3

Confirm action

Are you sure?