So let me get this right? There's only one right answer?

No pain, No gain. Your brain is not a muscle, but it is like a muscle. Therefore, treat your learning almost like working out. Get to the point of fatigue even past fatigue and then call it a day to recover from LSAT problems. Your brain will start to focus for longer durations if you practice this method.

I am going to score a 160+ on the LSAT this year. I am confident this is possible. All things are possible through Christ who strenghtheneth me.

I used Domain + Rule Framework for question #5. Would this be plausible? I took the domain as group of tenants and created a embedded conditional statement as the rule. A->(B-->C) or

Domain: Group of Tenants

Rule:

Abylaws --> (30sigs--> Put to vote).

Abylaws + 30 sigs --> Put to vote

This helped me to obtain my conclusion. I know this isn't necessarily the way that JY/prep reading teaches it but found it much quicker to interpret my own reasoning similar to the domain + rule Framework.

This JY lesson is gold

If negating the answer choice would completely ruin the argument then that is a required assumption of the argument. Hopefully this helps :)

I'm interested