This is the one question type I can't seem to be able to master after months of studying. I think my biggest problem is not having the right prephrase but overall just have a really hard time identifying subtle flaws. Does anyone have any suggestions that can help me improve identifying the flaw and also strategically eliminating answers?
@ said:
I believe this is the beginning of the lesson.
https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/advanced-bi-conditionals/
Thanks! I just reviewed the lesson and have a question: should I treat "... but not otherwise" the same as "if and only if"?
Does anyone know if the CC has a list or if there's a lesson on this? Thanks!
Is anyone else familiar with JY's suggestion of turning weakening questions into resolve questions (essentially reading all the premises and negating the conclusion in the stimulus, ultimately creating a paradox)? I have a lot of trouble with weakening questions, but when I turn them into resolve questions they seem so much easier to solve. Is this a method that I should adapt or could it become detrimental?
Hi everyone,
I'm very inconsistent with Reading Comprehension and one of the main things I'm seeing is that I spend so much time dwelling on trap answer choices and end up wasting so much time and momentum. I've done lots of practice but for some reason I always end up with 2 answer choices and basically just guess between the two. Any tips?
I agree. I've been drilling games for a week now and it's shocking how good you can become. Make sure you keep track of all the games you do and re-drill a game any time you get a question wrong. Do this consistently and you'll improve with timing and with making inferences. Also, do you have any tips for Reading Comprehension? How do you manage to only miss 2? My biggest problem is timing and miss like 7-8.
@ This is great advice. Thank you!